Skip to main content
Summons Private cases SS

HARI J IYERVsARINDAM BASU

CNR MHMM19014924201866-Judicial Magistrate (First Class), 66th Court
Metropolitan Magistrate, Andheri, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--DISMISSED
Decision Date: 05th February 2021

TrustJury record updated 28 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
6605198/2018
Registration Date
27 Dec 2018

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    2

    Petitioner

    1. 1HARI J IYER

    Respondent

    1. 1ARINDAM BASU

    Acts & Sections

    1
    Indian Penal Code · Sec 499 · 500

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 23-01-2019
Business: Resumed today
Ld APP is absent
Complainant is absent
Advocate is present
Next Purpose: NOT HEARD AT 2.45 P.M.
Next Hearing Date: 16-02-2019

Date: 16-02-2019
Business: Resumed today
Ld APP is present
Complainant and advocate absent
Next Purpose: NOT HEARD AT 2.45 P.M.
Next Hearing Date: 13-05-2019

Date: 13-05-2019
Business: complainant Absent
Ld. Adv.for complainant present
Next Purpose: NOT HEARD AT 2.45 P.M.
Next Hearing Date: 29-06-2019

Date: 29-06-2019
Business: Ld. M.M. is on Leave, hence board discharged, Charge with Ld. M.M. Railway Mobile court.
Next Purpose: NOT HEARD AT 2.45 P.M.
Next Hearing Date: 06-07-2019

Date: 06-07-2019
Business: Complainant absent
Ld. Adv. for complainant present
for verification.
Next Purpose: FOR VERIFICATION
Next Hearing Date: 03-08-2019

Date: 03-08-2019
Business: Both parties are absent.
Next Purpose: FOR VERIFICATION
Next Hearing Date: 04-10-2019

Date: 04-10-2019
Business: Complainant Present,
Ld. Adv. for complainant Present,
for verification.
Next Purpose: FOR VERIFICATION
Next Hearing Date: 02-11-2019

Date: 02-11-2019
Business: Complainant absent,
Ld. Adv. for complainant present,
for verification.
Next Purpose: FOR VERIFICATION
Next Hearing Date: 16-11-2019

Date: 16-11-2019
Business: In lieu of Transfer of Ld. M.M., Hence board discharged, Charged with Ld. M.M. Railway Mobile Court.
Next Purpose: FOR VERIFICATION
Next Hearing Date: 07-12-2019

Date: 07-12-2019
Business: Complainant ab adv ab
For verification
Next Purpose: FOR VERIFICATION
Next Hearing Date: 12-03-2020

Date: 12-03-2020
Business: Complainant Absent
Ld. Adv. for Complainant Absent
Accused Absent
Ld. Adv. for Accused Absent
Next Purpose: FOR VERIFICATION
Next Hearing Date: 29-04-2020

Date: 29-04-2020
Business: Board discharged. In view of circular from Honble P.D. J. bearing No. 66/2020, case is adjourned.
Reason For Adjournment: National Lock Down
Next Purpose: FOR VERIFICATION
Next Hearing Date: 28-07-2020

Date: 28-07-2020
Reason For Adjournment: Adjourned due to Covid-19
Next Purpose: FOR VERIFICATION
Next Hearing Date: 24-09-2020

Date: 24-09-2020
Business: Board Discharged.
Reason For Adjournment: Adjourned due to Covid-19
Next Purpose: FOR VERIFICATION
Next Hearing Date: 11-11-2020

Date: 11-11-2020
Business: Board Discharged
Reason For Adjournment: Adjourned due to Covid-19
Next Purpose: FOR VERIFICATION
Next Hearing Date: 05-02-2021

Date: 05-02-2021
Business: Complainant absent,
Ld. Adv. for complainant absent,
Order passed below Exh - 1.
Complaint stands Dismissed for want of Prosecution.
Proceeding be closed.
Nature Of Disposal: DISMISSED
Disposal Date: 05-02-2021

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 816706/2018
Filing Date: 27-12-2018
First Hearing Date: 23rd January 2019
Decision Date: 05th February 2021
Court Number And Judge: 66-Judicial Magistrate (First Class), 66th Court

    Orders

    1
    Final Order 1
    05 Feb 2021
    Order Details: Order below Ex-1
Pdf Text: IN THE COURT OF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE
66TH COURT, ANDHERI, MUMBAI
C.C. NO.5198/SS/2018
Mr. Hari J. Iyer ... Complainant
v/s.
Mr. Arindam Basu ... Accused
ORDER BELOW EXH.1
Perused the record and proceeding. None is present when
called for. Present complaint is filed against proposed accused for the
offences punishable under sections 499 & 500 of Indian Penal Code.
Matter is kept for verification. Inspite of sufficient opportunity,
complainant failed to avail himself for verification till today. Long
absence of complainant shows that he is not interested to proceed with
the matter. Therefore, complaint needs to be dismissed for want of
prosecution. Hence, I proceed to pass following order:
O R D E R
1. Complaint stands dismissed for want of prosecution.
2. Proceeding be closed.
Date : 05/02/2021 (Bhagawat T. Zirape)
Metropolitan Magistrate
66th Court, Andheri, Mumbai
-- 1 of 1 --

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.