Full Order Text
Interim Order 1 · 03 Feb 2020 · CNR MHMM190146182018
Order Details: Interim Maintenance Order Pdf Text: – 1 – C.C.NO.391/DV/2018 IN THE COURT OF THE METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE, 44th COURT, ANDHERI, MUMBAI. C. C. No. 44000391/DV/2018 Smt.Afnan @ Haniya Bilal Patel .. Applicant V/s Shri. Bilal Patel & Ors. .. Respondents Application under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act,2005 ORDER PASSED BELOW APPLICATION FILED UNDER SECTION 23 BY THE APPLICANT FOR INTERIM RELIEFS The Main Application is filed under Section 12 of Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 and present application is filed for interim monetary relief. 2. Brief facts of the applicant's case are that The applicant is married with respondent No.1 on 27/05/2018. Thereafter she resided with respondents at the house of respondents. She was illtreated from the first day of the marriage and started behaving very rudely and talking bad words about her parents. The respondents were not allowed the applicant to visit her parental house. After pregnancy respondents asked her to abort the child. They started torturing to the applicant. Respondent No.1 taking nude photos and making videos of the applicant for which she felt ashamed. It is further alleged that respondent No.1 spoiled the name of the applicant by saying that before marriage she had many affairs because of which ..2/ -- 1 of 4 -- – 2 – C.C.NO.391/DV/2018 she aborted her child. Due to all reasons all the respondents were treated the applicant badly and subjected to domestic violence. Therefore, she has filed the present applicant and prayed for interim monetary relief of Rs.2 Lakhs per month for her food, shelter and clothing. 3. All the respondents appeared in this proceeding and filed their say on the basis of the statement. Respondents have denied all the allegations of the applicant. When the respondent No.1 knows that the applicant was pregnant, all the family members wanted her to keep happy and never objected for her visiting or staying back in her parental home. The respondents always interested to know the overall health of the applicant and the child in her womb and respondent No.1 wanted her to carry out the general check up. In the month of September the applicant on the pretext of meeting of her family went with her relatives to the parental home and did not return home since then. Respondent No.2, 3 and 4 were residing separately. It is further stated that he is a student of Architecture College. He is also working with Kohinoor Developers as Apprentice/Student Trainee on a stipend of Rs.4,500/ per month. On all these contentions respondents prayed to reject the application of the applicant. 4. From the rival contentions of both the parties following points arise for my consideration and I have recorded my findings thereon for the reasons stated thereon. Sr.No. POINTS FINDINGS 1. Whether the applicant is entitled for interim monetary reliefs? Partly in the affirmative ..3/ -- 2 of 4 -- – 3 – C.C.NO.391/DV/2018 2. What order? As per the final order. R E A S O N S AS TO POINT NO.1: 5. Relation between the parties as to the marriage is an admitted position. Applicant has alleged various incidents of which she was subject to physical and mental happenings. She has alleged that respondent No.1 has exwife and she had not informed about the first marriage. The respondents have denied all the allegations of the main application, however mere denial is not sufficient. I do not find any just and proper reason to disbelieve the applicant. Hence, I find that applicant has prima facie proved that she was subject to some of sort of mental and physical harassment. Therefore, she is entitled to relief as she prayed through this application. Hence, I answered Point No.(1) in the partly affirmative. AS TO POINT NO.2 6. The applicant has claimed interim monetary relief of sum of Rs.2 Lakhs per month. She resides at her matrimonial house presently. After marriage it is duty of the husband to maintain his wife. As per the submission of the applicant it is prima facie proved that respondent No.1 has not made any arrangement of her maintenance. Applicant has submitted that respondent No.1 is a businessman and also running construction company and his monthly income is Rs.5 Lakhs and his yearly income is Rs.60 Lakhs. In such a situation, respondent No.1 has sufficient means to maintain the applicant. ..4/ -- 3 of 4 -- – 4 – C.C.NO.391/DV/2018 7. At this stage it is evident that respondent No.1 has prima facie neglected to maintain the applicant. The applicant failed to produce any documentary evidence to show that he is having any amount of income as per her main application. Therefore, in such a situation or in absence of any document of income proof, living standard of both the parties should be taken into consideration and cost of essential commodities also be taken into consideration, I find that interim monetary relief of Rs.10,000/(Rupees Ten Thousand only) per month will suffice the purpose. Hence, I answered Point No.(2) as follows. O R D E R 1. Application is partly allowed. 2. Respondent No.1 is hereby directed to pay interim monetary relief of Rs.10,000/(Rupees Ten Thousand only) per month to the applicant from the date of present application till final order. 3. Copy of this order be provided to the applicant free of cost. ( A.I.Shaikh ) Metropolitan Magistrate, Date : 03.02.2020 44th Court, Andheri, Mumbai. vnh. ../ -- 4 of 4 --
