Skip to main content
Summons Private cases SS

ANUP-PANCHU-MONDALVsPRASAD-DINKAR-PARAB

CNR MHMM19013974201844-Judicial Magistrate (First Class), 44th Court
Metropolitan Magistrate, Andheri, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--258 CRPC PROCEEDING STOPPED
Decision Date: 22nd July 2024

TrustJury record updated 28 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
4401997/2018
Registration Date
10 Jul 2018

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    2

    Petitioner

    1. 1ANUP-PANCHU-MONDAL

    Respondent

    1. 1PRASAD-DINKAR-PARAB

    Acts & Sections

    1
    DRUGS AND COSMETICS ACT · Sec 138

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 27-12-2018
Business: Complainant absent his advocate is present. Accused absent his advocate is absent. Complainant pray for date as
Report of warrant/summons is pending.
Next Purpose: NOT HEARD CASES
Next Hearing Date: 10-06-2019

Date: 10-06-2019
Business: Both party are absent. Their advocate also absent. For Step
Next Purpose: NOT HEARD CASES
Next Hearing Date: 07-12-2019

Date: 07-12-2019
Next Purpose: NOT HEARD CASES
Next Hearing Date: 26-03-2020

Date: 26-03-2020
Business: As per office order board is discharged
Next Purpose: NOT HEARD CASES
Next Hearing Date: 24-06-2020

Date: 24-06-2020
Reason For Adjournment: Adjourned due to Covid-19
Next Purpose: NOT HEARD CASES
Next Hearing Date: 26-11-2020

Date: 26-11-2020
Business: Only urgent matters will be heard as per the CMM court order, That is why other board are being discharged due to the contagious disease of Covid-19 virus.
Next Purpose: NOT HEARD CASES
Next Hearing Date: 07-04-2021

Date: 07-04-2021
Business: due to covid 19 board is discharge as per direction
Next Purpose: NOT HEARD CASES
Next Hearing Date: 10-06-2021

Date: 10-06-2021
Business: As per the order of Hon''ble C.M.M. Court, Board is being discharged due to lockdown to prevent transmission of the second wave of coivd-19 virus.
Next Purpose: NOT HEARD CASES
Next Hearing Date: 12-11-2021

Date: 12-11-2021
Business: Both party are absent. Their advocate also absent. For Step.
Next Purpose: For Steps
Next Hearing Date: 02-05-2022

Date: 02-05-2022
Business: M M is on vacation leave charge with M. M 48th court board discharge
Next Purpose: For Steps
Next Hearing Date: 21-09-2022

Date: 21-09-2022
Business: For report
09-02-2023
Next Purpose: For Steps
Next Hearing Date: 09-02-2023

Date: 09-02-2023
Business: Complainant and his advocate are absent when matter is called out.
06-10-2023
Next Purpose: For Steps
Next Hearing Date: 06-10-2023

Date: 06-10-2023
Business: Complainant and his advocate are absent when matter is called out.
For steps.
24-04-2024
Next Purpose: For Steps
Next Hearing Date: 24-04-2024

Date: 24-04-2024
Business: Complainant and his advocate are absent when matter is called out.
No steps are taken since long.
For dismissal order.
22-07-2024
Next Purpose: FOR SPECIAL DRIVE
Next Hearing Date: 22-07-2024

Date: 22-07-2024
Business: Complainant and his advocate are absent when matter is called out.
No steps are taken since long.
Today matter kept for special drive.
Complaint is dismissed.
For reason separately recorded.
Hence disposed.
Nature Of Disposal: 258 CRPC PROCEEDING STOPPED
Disposal Date: 22-07-2024

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 805976/2018
Filing Date: 10-07-2018
First Hearing Date: 27th December 2018
Decision Date: 22nd July 2024
Court Number And Judge: 44-Judicial Magistrate (First Class), 44th Court

    Orders

    1
    Final Order 1
    22 Jul 2024
    Order Details: Order below Ex-1
Pdf Text: IN THE COURT OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE FIRST CLASS,
ANDHERI, MUMBAI.
C.C. No.1997/SS/2018
Mr. Anup Panchu Mondal …. Complainant
V/s.
Mr. Prasad Dinkar Parab …. Accused
ORDER BELOW EXHIBIT NO.1
(Passed on 22/07/2024)
The present case on hand came to be filed under Section 138 of the
Negotiable Instruments Act.
2. Having gone through the roznama and case papers, it appears
that the complainant is absent since long time. Moreover, no positive step
was taken by the complainant within a span of last six years. Thus, this case
is unattended. In such circumstances, it appears that the case comes within
the ambit of stale and ineffective case. Hence, having regard to the pendency
of the case, it is required to be disposed of in the Special Drive. Resultantly, I
pass the following order:
ORDER
i] The case is dismissed for want of prosecution.
ii] The original documents filed in this case be returned to the concerned
parties.
iii] The case be closed accordingly.
Sd/
(Sujitkumar C. Tayde)
Judicial Magistrate First Class,
Date: 22/07/2024 Andheri, Mumbai.
spj
-- 1 of 1 --

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.