Skip to main content
Summons warrent Cases SW

TISHYA ROY CHAUDHARYVsPRIYA RAJIV VARTAK +1 more

CNR MHMM19013463201866-Judicial Magistrate (First Class), 66th Court
Metropolitan Magistrate, Andheri, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--156-3 DISPOSAL
Decision Date: 01st March 2019

TrustJury record updated 27 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
6600516/2018
Registration Date
04 Dec 2018

Advocates

0

No advocate information is available in this record.

Parties

3

Petitioner

  1. 1TISHYA ROY CHAUDHARY

Respondent

  1. 1PRIYA RAJIV VARTAK
  2. 2RAJIV VARTAK

Acts & Sections

1
Indian Penal Code · Sec 406420506II

Case History / Proceedings

Case History
Date: 16-02-2019
Business: Resumed today
Ld APP is present
Complainant is present with advocate
Argument heard
Next Purpose: For order
Next Hearing Date: 01-03-2019

Date: 01-03-2019
Business: Resumed today
Ld APP is absent
Complainant is present with advocate
Today order is passed.
                     ORDER
Order of 156(3) is passed for investigation. Order is passed separately.
Nature Of Disposal: 156-3 DISPOSAL
Disposal Date: 01-03-2019

Additional Case Details

Additional Case Details
Filing Number: 815415/2018
Filing Date: 04-12-2018
First Hearing Date: 16th February 2019
Decision Date: 01st March 2019
Court Number And Judge: 66-Judicial Magistrate (First Class), 66th Court

Orders

1
Final Order 1Full order available
01 Mar 2019

Pdf Text: IN THE COURT OF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE, 66TH COURT, ANDHERI, MUMBAI. C. C. No. : 516/SW/2018 ORDER BELOW (EXH.1 ) Read the complaint, affidavit of the complainant. Perused documents filed alongwith it. Heard Ld. Counsel for complainant, at length. 2. Ld. Counsel for complainant submitted that, accused No. 1 and 2 agreed to let the shop to complainant on leave and licence, in that regard complainant paid `.1,00,000/ to accused. However, accused neither let shop to complainant nor returned…

Read Full Order

TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.