Skip to main content
Summons warrent Cases SW

SUNITA SHANKAR SATALEVsKISAN JADHAV AND OTHER +1 more

CNR MHMM19013053201866-Judicial Magistrate (First Class), 66th Court
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--DISMISSED
Decision Date: 05th March 2020

TrustJury record updated 27 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
6600468/2018
Registration Date
24 Oct 2018

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    3

    Acts & Sections

    1
    Indian Penal Code · Sec 336 · 427 · 441

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 03-12-2018
    Business: COMPLAINANT PRESENT
    LD. ADV. FOR COMPLAINANT PRESENT
    Next Purpose: NOT HEARD CASES
    Next Hearing Date: 10-12-2018
    
    Date: 10-12-2018
    Business: Complainant Absent
    Ld. Adv. for Complainant Present
    Accused Absent
    Next Purpose: NOT HEARD CASES
    Next Hearing Date: 22-01-2019
    
    Date: 22-01-2019
    Business: Complainant Absent
    Ld. Adv. for complainant Present
    keep for order
    Next Purpose: For order
    Next Hearing Date: 31-01-2019
    
    Date: 31-01-2019
    Business: Resumed today
    Ld APP is present
    Complainant is present with advocate.
    Heard argument. Today order is passed separately. For verification
    Next Purpose: FOR VERIFICATION
    Next Hearing Date: 11-03-2019
    
    Date: 11-03-2019
    Business: Resumed today
    Ld APP is present
    Complainant is present with advocate
    Next Purpose: FOR VERIFICATION
    Next Hearing Date: 01-04-2019
    
    Date: 01-04-2019
    Business: Resumed today
    Ld APP is present
    Complainant is present with advocate
    For argument
    Next Purpose: FOR VERIFICATION
    Next Hearing Date: 22-04-2019
    
    Date: 22-04-2019
    Business: Resumed today
    Ld APP is present
    Ld MM is on half day leave
    Board is discharged. Charge with ACMM, 22nd Court
    Next Purpose: FOR ARGUMENTS
    Next Hearing Date: 16-05-2019
    
    Date: 16-05-2019
    Business: Both parties are absent
    Next Purpose: FOR ARGUMENTS
    Next Hearing Date: 17-06-2019
    
    Date: 17-06-2019
    Business: Resumed today
    Complainant is absent
    Advocate is present
    For argument
    Next Purpose: FOR ARGUMENTS
    Next Hearing Date: 03-07-2019
    
    Date: 03-07-2019
    Business: Both parties are absent
    Next Purpose: FOR ARGUMENTS
    Next Hearing Date: 05-09-2019
    
    Date: 05-09-2019
    Business: Both Parties are Absent
    Next Purpose: FOR ARGUMENTS
    Next Hearing Date: 24-10-2019
    
    Date: 24-10-2019
    Business: Both Parties are Absent
    Next Purpose: FOR ARGUMENTS
    Next Hearing Date: 01-01-2020
    
    Date: 01-01-2020
    Business: complainant ab adv. ab.
    Next Purpose: FOR ARGUMENTS
    Next Hearing Date: 05-03-2020
    
    Date: 05-03-2020
    Business: Complainant Absent
    Ld. Adv. for Complainant Absent
    Nature Of Disposal: DISMISSED
    Disposal Date: 05-03-2020

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 13157/2018
    Filing Date: 24-10-2018
    First Hearing Date: 03rd December 2018
    Decision Date: 05th March 2020
    Court Number And Judge: 66-Judicial Magistrate (First Class), 66th Court

    Orders

    1
    Final Order 1
    05 Mar 2020
    Order Details: Order
    Pdf Text: IN THE COURT OF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE
    66TH COURT, ANDHERI, MUMBAI
    C.C. NO.468/SW/2018
    Sunita Shankar Satale ... Complainant
    v/s.
    1) Mr. Kisan Jadhav
    2) Mr. Nitesh Jadhav ... Accused
    ORDER BELOW EXH.1
    Perused the record and proceeding. None is present when
    called for. Present complaint is filed against proposed accused for the
    offences punishable under sections 336, 427, 441 of Indian Penal Code.
    Perusal of complaint discloses vague and general allegations against
    proposed accused. Dispute between parties appears to be of civil nature.
    No any argument is advanced on behalf of complainant till today. It
    appears that complainant has lost interest in the matter. Matter remains
    unattended since long. Hence, complaint needs to be dismissed for want
    of prosecution. Hence, I pass the following order:
    O R D E R
    1. Complaint stands dismissed for want of prosecution.
    2. Proceeding be closed.
    Date : 05/03/2020 (Bhagawat T. Zirape)
    Metropolitan Magistrate
    66th Court, Andheri, Mumbai
    -- 1 of 1 --

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.