Skip to main content
Police Cases PS

JOGESHWARI P STN C.R.NO. 85/2018VsAJINKYA SANTOSH SATARDEKAR

CNR MHMM19012275201810-Judicial Magistrate (First Class), 10th Court
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--DISMISSED IN SPECIAL DRIVE
Decision Date: 04th May 2022

TrustJury record updated 27 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
1003349/2018
Registration Date
22 Nov 2018

Advocates

2

For Petitioner

For Respondent

Parties

2

Acts & Sections

1
NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT · Sec 142

Police / FIR Details

Police Station
JOGESHWARI
FIR Number / Year
85/2018

Case History / Proceedings

Case History
Date: 22-11-2018
Business: As per roznama
Next Purpose: NOT HEARD CASES
Next Hearing Date: 28-11-2018

Date: 28-11-2018
Business: Ld. App present
Accused absent
For charge
Next Purpose: NOT HEARD CASES
Next Hearing Date: 28-06-2019

Date: 28-06-2019
Business: Ld. App present
Accused absent
For charge
Next Purpose: NOT HEARD CASES
Next Hearing Date: 05-11-2019

Date: 05-11-2019
Business: Ld. App present
Accused absent
For charge
Next Purpose: NOT HEARD CASES
Next Hearing Date: 16-03-2020

Date: 16-03-2020
Business: As Ld.MM is on mediation training, hence case is adjourned
For charge
Next Purpose: NOT HEARD CASES
Next Hearing Date: 23-09-2020

Date: 23-09-2020
Business: As per directions of Honble High Court, due to precautions against Corona Virus and as there is no urgency in the matter, hence case is adjourned
Next Purpose: NOT HEARD CASES
Next Hearing Date: 26-03-2021

Date: 26-03-2021
Business: Ld. APP is present. Accused absent. Advocate for Accused is absent. Case is adjourned.
Next Purpose: NOT HEARD CASES
Next Hearing Date: 28-09-2021

Date: 28-09-2021
Business: Ld. APP is absent. Accused absent. Adv. for accused is absent.
Next Purpose: NOT HEARD CASES
Next Hearing Date: 25-03-2022

Date: 25-03-2022
Business: Ld. APP absent. Accused is absent. Adv. for accused is absent. Case is adjourned.
Next Purpose: NOT HEARD CASES
Next Hearing Date: 04-05-2022

Date: 04-05-2022
Business: In perview of directions of Honble Registrar Inspection - I, of Honble High Court, Mumbai vide letter bearing no. B(Gen)- 1001/2022/714, dated 13/04/2022, the case is taken on todays board for special drive.   The case came to be instituted for the offence u/s. 142 of Bombay Police Act, 1951.   The case is petty in nature.    There is no positive material against accused.   Hence, keeping in view the petty nature of this chapter proceeding,     The proceeding is stopped u/s. 258 Cr.PC.    Accused is discharged in his absence from the offence u/s. 142 of Bombay Police Act, 1951.   His bail bond, if any, stands canceled.
Nature Of Disposal: DISMISSED IN SPECIAL DRIVE
Disposal Date: 04-05-2022

Additional Case Details

Additional Case Details
Filing Number: 814804/2018
Filing Date: 22-11-2018
First Hearing Date: 22nd November 2018
Decision Date: 04th May 2022
Court Number And Judge: 10-Judicial Magistrate (First Class), 10th Court

Orders

1
Final Order 1
04 May 2022
Order Details: Order below Ex-1
Pdf Text: C. C. No. 3349 / PS / 2018.
(Ref : Hon’ble Registrar Inspection-I, High Court letter bearing
No. B(Gen)-1001/2022/714, dated 13.04.2022).
ORDER BELOW EXH. 1
(Passed on 04.05.2022)
In purview of above referred directions, the case is taken on today’s
board for Special Drive. The case came to be instituted for the offence
under section 142 of of Mumbai Police Act, 1951. The case is petty in
nature. There is no positive material against accused. Hence, keeping in
view the petty nature of this chapter proceeding, I am satisfied to stop
this case under section 258 of Cr. P. C. Hence, I am satisfied to pass
following order -
O R D E R
i The proceeding is stopped under section 258 of Cr. P. C.
ii Accused namely Ajinkaya Santosh Satardekar is
discharged in his absence from the offence under section 142
of Mumbai Police Act, 1951.
iii His bail bond, if any, stands cancelled.
Sd/-
Dt.04.05.2022. (R. R. Khan)
Metropolitan Magistrate,
10th Court, Andheri, Mumbai.
-- 1 of 1 --

TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.