Full Order Text
Order 2 · 15 Dec 2023 · CNR MHMM190110362018
Order Details: Order Pdf Text: IN THE COURT OF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE 44TH COURT, ANDHERI, MUMBAI. C.C.No.3679/SS/2018 Mr. Raju Satyanarayan Sharma, …. Complainant V/s. M/s. Balaji Jewellers and Money Lenders and Ors., …. Accused ORDER ON EXH.NO.24 By way of this application, the complainant who filed the complaint under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, has prayed to pass an order under section 421 of the Code of Criminal Procedure against the accused on account of his failure to comply the order passed by this Court under section 143 (A) of the Negotiable Instruments Act. 2. According to the complainant, this Court allowed the application filed by the complainant under Section 143 (A) of the Negotiable Instruments Act on 23/06/2022 and thereby directed the accused to pay/deposit 20% of the cheque amount as the compensation within 60 days from the date of the order. The complainant further alleges that in spite of having the knowledge about the said order, the accused deliberately avoided to obey it. 3. It is further pleaded that the complainant is in need of money, but the accused intentionally and willfully committed default by disobeying the directions given by this Court in the said order dt.23/06/2022. Thus, in short, according to the complainant, the accused fails to pay the amount of interim compensation within the stipulated period and, therefore, the accused is required to be imprisoned for noncompliance of the said order. -- 1 of 6 -- 4. The learned advocate for the accused resisted the application by way of filing the reply and has taken a stand that instead of adducing the evidence, the complainant filed this application to delay the trial deliberately. It is the stand of the accused that the case is based on bogus transaction and therefore, the order regarding the imprisonment of accused is not justified. 5. The learned advocate for the complainant, vehemently argued that the accused used to get the warrant cancelled and did not obey the order passed by this Court. Hence, according to him, in order to maintain the sanctity of the order, the accused is required to be kept in Jail so that he shall understand the consequences of disobedience of the order. Per contra, the learned advocate for the accused submitted that unless and until the due procedure is followed, the accused cannot be imprisoned. 6. Having heard the learned advocates for both the parties, I perused the record. Following points are formulated for my determination: Sr. No. POINTS FINDINGS 1 Whether the complainant is entitled to initiate the proceeding against the accused for imprisonment due to disobedience of the order passed under section 143 (A) of the Negotiable Instruments Act? In affirmative 2 What order? The application is partly allowed as per final order. REASONS AS TO POINT NO.1. 7. At the outset, it is pertinent to note here that the learned -- 2 of 6 -- predecessor of this Court passed the order under section 143 (A) (1) of the Negotiable Instruments Act and thereby ordered that 20% of the cheque amount be made over by the accused to the complainant as interim compensation. But the record shows that the accused failed to comply the said order. In such scenario, before embarking upon the conclusion, it is necessary to have a glance at the provisions of section 143 (A) of the Negotiable Instruments Act which was inserted in the Act by Amendment Act 20 of 2018 with effect from 01/09/2018. This section reads as under: 143 A. Power to direct interim compensation. (1) Notwithstanding anything contained in the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), the Court trying an offence under section 138 may order the drawer of the cheque to pay interim compensation to the complainant (a) in a summary trial or a summons case, where he pleads not guilty to the accusation made in the complaint; and (b) in any other case, upon framing of charge. (2) The interim compensation under subsection (1) shall not exceed twenty per cent of the amount of the cheque. (3) The interim compensation shall be paid within sixty days from the date of the order under subsection (1), or within such further period not exceeding thirty days as may be directed by the Court on sufficient cause being shown by the drawer of the cheque. (4) If the drawer of the cheque is acquitted, the Court shall direct the complainant to repay to the drawer the amount of interim compensation, with interest at the bank rate as published by the Reserve Bank of India, prevalent at the beginning of the relevant financial years, within sixty days from the date of the order, or within such further period not exceeding thirty days as may be directed by the Court on sufficient cause being shown by the complainant. (5) The interim compensation payable under this section may be recovered as if it were a fine under section 421 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974). -- 3 of 6 -- (6) The amount of the imposed under section 138 or the amount of compensation awarded under section 357 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), shall be reduced by the amount paid or recovered as interim compensation under this section”. 8. In the present case on hand, it is evident that the learned Predecessor of this Court awarded the interim compensation under section 143 (A) of the Negotiable Instruments Act on 23/06/2022. So also it is admitted position that the accused has not deposited the said amount till passing this order. In such circumstances, in view of sub section (5) of section 143 (A), the interim compensation may be recovered as it were fine under section 421 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. So let us have a glance at the provision of section 421 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. “421. Warrant for levy of fine (1) When an offender has been sentenced to pay a fine, the Court passing the sentence may take action for the recovery of the fine in either or both of the following ways, that is to say, it may (a) issue a warrant for the levy of the amount by attachment and sale of any movable property belonging to the offender; (b) issue a warrant to the Collector of the district, authorising him to realise the amount as arrears of land revenue from the movable or immovable property, or both, of the defaulter. Provided that, if the sentence directs that in default of payment of the fine, the offender shall be imprisoned, and if such offender has undergone the whole of such imprisonment in default, no Court shall issue such warrant unless, for special reasons to be recorded in writing, it considers it necessary so to do, or unless it has made an order for the payment of expenses or compensation out of the fine under section 357. (2) The State Government may make rules regulating the manner in which warrants under clause (a) of subsection (1) are to be executed, and for the summary determination of any claims made by any person other than the offender in respect of any property attached in execution of such warrant. -- 4 of 6 -- (3) Where the Court issues a warrant to the Collector under clause (b) of subsection (1), the Collector shall realise the amount in accordance with the law relating to recovery of arrears of land revenue, as if such warrant were a certificate issued under such law: Provided that no such warrant shall be executed by the arrest or detention in prison of the offender.” 9. In fact, the Hon'ble Apex Court has dealt with the issue which is involved in the present case on hand. In other words, the Hon'ble Apex Court has laid down the guidelines in the case of G. J. Raja V/s. Tejraj Surana (Criminal Appeal No.1160/2019) in respect of the procedure to be adopted if the accused fails to pay the interim compensation awarded under section 143 (A) of the Negotiable Instruments Act. In this citation, the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India held as under: “It is thus clear that in case an accused, against whom an order to pay interim compensation under section 143 A of the Act is passed, fails or is unable to pay the amount of interim compensation, the process under section 421 can be taken resort to which may interalia result in coercive action of recovery of the amount of interim compensation as if the amount represented the arrears of land revenue. The extent and rigor of the procedure prescribed for such recovery may vary from State to State but invariably, such procedure may visit the person concerned with coercive methods”. (Para 12) “For instance, by virtue or section 183 of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966, in case there be a default in payment of land revenue, the person concerned could be arrested and detained in custody for 10 days in the office of the Collector or of a Tehsildar unless the arrears of revenue which were due, were paid along with the penalty or interest and the cost of arrest and of the notice of demand as also the cost -- 5 of 6 -- of his subsistence during detention”.(Para 13) 10. Having regard to the ratio laid down in the citation supra, this Court is of humble opinion that the complainant is entitled to initiate the proceeding for recovery of the interim compensation as contemplated under section 421 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Resultantly, I record my finding in affirmative for point No.1. 11. Having gone through the record, it appears that the accused resides in Unit No.7, Madras Pada, R. A. Milk Colony, Goregaon (E), Mumbai. This area comes within the jurisdiction of District Collector Borivali. Hence, having regard to the residence of the accused, I pass the following order: ORDER 1 The application is partly allowed 2 The District Collector Borivali is hereby authorised to initiate the recovery proceeding of the interim compensation amount of Rs.80,000/ (Rupees Eighty Thousand Only) i.e. 20% amount of the total cheque amount against the accused as per section 183 of Maharashtra Land Revenue Court. 3 The District Collector – Borivali, shall submit the report regarding the compliance of this order to this Court. 4 The office Superintendent of this Court is hereby directed to intimate the order to the District Collector Borivali. Sd/ ( Sujitkumar C. Tayde ) Metropolitan Magistrate, Date : 15.12.2023 44th Court, Andheri, Mumbai. -- 6 of 6 --
