Full Order Text
Interim Order 1 · 30 Mar 2024 · CNR MHMM190096342018
Order Details: Order Pdf Text: 1 C. C. No.3364/SS/2018 Exh.30 ORDER BELOW EXH.30 1. This is an application filed by accused for recalling C.W.1 under Section 311 of Cr. P.C and setting aside order dated 16/12/2022. 2. Brief contentions in the application are as under: Complainant has filed present complaint under Section 138 of N.I. Act. Accused appeared before the Court and pleaded not guilty. Evidence affidavit of C.W.1 was filed on 05/09/2019 alongwith list of documents. On 04/02/2020 an order of exhibiting documents is passed. Since then matter is pending for cross-examination of C.W.1. On 16/12/2022 accused was absent when called out in the Court hence, the court was pleased to pass an order of ‘no-cross’ against him and the matter was posted for further evidence of complainant. On that date the accused and his advocate got late and meanwhile said order was passed against him. Accused is having good case on merit and required to be put up his defence on record through cross-examination of C.W.1. Material facts is required to be brought on record. No prejudice will be caused to the complainant if present application is allowed. Hence, this application. 3. Complainant has filed her reply at (Exh.31) and objected the application. She has submitted that accused is irregular in defending his case. She next submits that ample opportunities are granted him to take cross-examination of C.W.1 but he failed to do so. She further submitted that accused by filing unwanted application, gaining time and adopted delayed tactics. Hence, She prayed to reject the application. -- 1 of 2 -- 2 C. C. No.3364/SS/2018 Exh.30 4. Heard advocate for both sides. 5. Perused record. It appears that additional evidence affidavit of C.W.1 is filed on 05/09/2019. Since then matter is pending for cross-examination of complainant. Till 16/12/2022 cross- examination of C.W.1 was not conducted hence, an order of ‘no-cross’ was passed and the matter is posted for further evidence of complainant. Considering this fact and ground mentioned by accused in the application, interest of justice requires that accused may be given fair opportunity to put up his defence. So application deserves to be allowed. At the same time it cannot be ignored that there has been delay in the disposal of case due to accused, so some cost is necessary to be saddled on him. In the result, I pass following order : ORDER 1. Application is allowed subject to payment of costs of Rs.500/- (Rupees Five Hundred Only) to the complainant. 2. Complainant be recalled for cross-examination on payment of cost amount. Date : 30/03/2024 Sd/- ( Shri. R.D. Dange ) Metropolitan Magistrate, 63rd Court, Andheri, Mumbai -- 2 of 2 --
