Full Order Text
Final Order 1 · 26 Aug 2024 · CNR MHMM190093662018
Order Details: Order Pdf Text: JUDGMENT 1 C.C. NO.273/DV/2018 MHMM190093662018 Presented on : 19.09.2018 Registered on : 19.09.2018 Decided on : 26.08.2024 Duration : 05Y 11M 07D Exh. No. BEFORE THE ADDIL. CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, 22nd COURT, ANDHERI, MUMBAI. (Presided Over by J. W. Gaikw ad) C.C.No. 273/DV/2018 Mrs. Shazia Shahnawaz Mirza (maiden name Miss. Shazia Mohsin Alam) Age : 34 years, Occupation:Housewife R/at : Room No.7, Road No.2 Paras C.H.S. Ltd., near Dr. Lalit Church Pakhadi Road, Sahar Village, Andheri(E), Mumbai – 400 099. : .…. Applicant V/s. 1) Mr. Shahnawaz Rafiq Miya Mirza Age : 31 years, Occupation : Business 2) Mrs. Anees Rafiq Fatima Age : 55 years, Occupation : Housewife 3) Mrs. Seemabano Nazafail Age : 53 years, Occupation : Housewife : ….. Respondents All are r/o 546/646/005, near Daddy Cool Corner, Belanganj, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh. APPEARANCE :- Ld. Counsel Elvis Llovo Netto for Applicant. Ld. Counsel Mr. Mohammad Qais for respondents ...02/- -- 1 of 6 -- JUDGMENT 2 C.C. NO.273/DV/2018 APPLICATION UNDER SECTIONS 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 22 & 23 OF THE PROTECTION OF WOMEN FROM DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ACT, 2005 J U D G M E N T (Delivered on 26.08.2024) 1 Respondent No.1 is the husband of applicant and respondent No.2 is her mother-in-law and respondent No.3 is her sister- in-law. The marriage between applicant and respondent No.1 was solemnized on 26.10.2008. After marriage she went to her matrimonial house for cohabitation at Lucknow. During co-habitation the behaviour of respondents against the applicant went normal for a very short period and afterwards the respondents started showing their real colour against applicant. Respondents started harassing her. During cohabitation they deliberately retained with them her passport, PAN card and other documents of the applicant along with her jewelries, clothes, utensils. In the meantime the applicant became pregnant and while pregnancy she was subjected to domestic violence by pressurizing herself to bring a dowry of Rs.15,00,000/- from her parental home to renovate matrimonial home in Lucknow. When the applicant shown her incapability the respondents started harassing her and ill-treated her and compelled her either to fulfill their demand or quit the matrimonial home. 2. It is further contended by her that, the respondents expelled her out of the matrimonial home. She delivered a female child on 26.10.2008 at Mumbai and the entire expenses were incurred by her parents, on the contrary respondents never pay a single penny or care ...03/- -- 2 of 6 -- JUDGMENT 3 C.C. NO.273/DV/2018 to see applicant and her daughter. The respondents strictly refused to take applicant back in the matrimonial home. The parents of applicant purchased separate accommodation in the name of applicant at Lucknow and during co-habitation respondent No.1 again started torturing applicant by not providing basic need and money exposing her to economical abuse. On various occasions respondents raised hand on her and in this regard finally applicant lodged a N.C. complaint on 05.08.2018 in Thakurganj Police Station, Lucknow against the respondent. The applicant was also threatened by respondents that they intended to remarry the respondent No.1 with someone else. They also took custody of minor daughter and after efforts through concerned Police Station she succeeded to get custody of her minor daughter back. The respondents have also locked the newly purchased accommodation of applicant forcibly by detaining her valuables, clothes and other articles therein. 3. According to the applicant she has no source of income to maintain her and the minor daughter. On the other hand the respondent No.1 is running an electronic shop and does repairing work of electronic appliances and earns Rs. 40,000/- p.m. from the business. He has deliberately neglected applicant and her daughter and they are running short of means to maintain themselves. Therefore, on the count of series of domestic violence, the applicant and her daughter deserves beneficial interest in the shared household, protection, compensation and maintenance from the respondents. 4. The respondent was served with notice, but failed to ...04/- -- 3 of 6 -- JUDGMENT 4 C.C. NO.273/DV/2018 appear before Court and the matter was proceeded ex-parte. 5. Considering the submissions of applicant following points arise for my determination and I record my findings thereon with reason thereof :- POINTS FINDINGS 1) Does the applicant prove that, respondents committed domestic violence against her? : Yes. 2) Does applicant entitled to maintenance, if yes to what extent? : Maintenance @ Rs.15,000/- per month 3) What order? : Application is partly allowed. -: R E A S O N S :- POINT Nos. 1 to 3 :- 6. Perused the record. Heard Ld. Advocate for the applicant. The applicant testified vide Exh-2 that she is legally wedded wife of respondent No.1. From the wed-lock she gave birth to a female child by name Zehra Shahnawaz Mirza, she is presently 15 years old. After marriage she went to Lucknow to her matrimonial place where she resided in joint family. Other respondents used to instigate her husband and on instigation they used to physically and verbally abuse her. They started demanding Rs.15,00,000/- for raising second floor on existing building at Lucknow. When she shown her incapability to meet the demand, she was physically harassed and expelled from house. She ...05/- -- 4 of 6 -- JUDGMENT 5 C.C. NO.273/DV/2018 even delivered her child at Mumbai on the expenses of her parents and even after delivering the child they were not keen to take her back. She anyhow managed to go back, but again was mentally and physically harassed. Even she was compelled to file her report at Police Station on 05.08.2018. 7. In order to see their daughter happy, the parents of the applicant purchased separate accommodation for her at Lucknow itself, so that she could live happily with her husband and daughter too. But the things were not normal, respondent No.1 without any reason used to indulge in a row and was not providing basic needs to her and even not giving financial aid, thereby exposing her to economical abuse. 8. The respondent No.1 is running an electronic shop and also does repairing work of electronic appliances and earns around Rs.40,000/- p.m. The entire testimony of the applicant went unchallenged. There is no reason to disbelieve the testimony of the applicant. Even there are instances showing mental and physical abuse to applicant. The report placed on record is sufficient to gather a fact that she has undergone domestic violence at the hands of respondents. Record shows that the ex-parte ad-interim maintenance amount was also granted and respondent No.1 was directed to pay her interim maintenance. Despite direction the respondent failed to comply the order, which itself shows that the respondent No.1 indulged in economic abuse towards applicant. Therefore, the oral evidence clubbed with documentary evidence is sufficient to answer all the points in the affirmative. Since the respondent No.1 is having source of ...06/- -- 5 of 6 -- JUDGMENT 6 C.C. NO.273/DV/2018 income as he runs an electronic shop, therefore he is capable enough to maintain his wife and the child. Looking to the status of the parties, maintenance of Rs. 15,000/- per month from the date of the petition will subserve the purpose. Hence, following order :- O R D E R 1. The petition is partly allowed. 2. The respondents are hereby prohibited from committing any sort of domestic violence upon applicant. 3. The respondent No.1 shall pay Rs.15,000/- per month maintenance to the applicant from the date of filing of the petition. 4. The order of interim maintenance is merged with the final order. 5. Any payment made in compliance to the interim order shall be adjusted while considering the final maintenance order, from the date of application. 6. The copy of judgment shall also be forwarded to local Police Station as well as Protection Officer. (Judgment dictated on dais and pronounced in open court). Sd/- Date.:- 26.08.2024 (J. W. Gaikwad) Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate 22nd Court, Andheri, Mumbai csj .../- -- 6 of 6 --
