Full Order Text
Final Order 1 · 14 Sept 2022 · CNR MHMM190086982018
Order Details: Order below Ex-1 Pdf Text: IN THE COURT OF THE METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE, RAILWAY MOBILE COURT, ANDHERI, MUMBAI C. C. No. 356 / SW / 2018 Asif Anwar Pawar Vs. Mohammed Umar Muslim Choudhary + 1 ORDER BELOW EXH.1 This is a complaint filed under section 406, 420, 504, 506 and 120B read with section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted by complainant that he lended friendly loan for payment to the real owner of the land at Pelhar, Survey No.293, survey no. 90, survey no.92 and survey no.94 house mentioned in para no.3 of the complaint. It was agreed between him and accused that accused have agreed to return the amount of Rs.1,50,00,000/ by mode of Rs.1,00,000/ per guntha i.e. Rs.2,80,00,000/ on or before 16/05/2008 and accordingly agreement was registered on 13/06/2007. The complainant submits that he has filed copy of agreement on record, but perusing the record no such copy was filed by him. The complainant further submits that he has paid amount to the accused. The complainant further submits that the complainant approached to the accused for returning amount of Rs.8,40,00,000/ which was agreed to return on or before 15/11/2017. The complainant has submits that accused has deliberately cheated him and deprived him from his title interest of the said property situated at Vasai which comes under District Thane. The complainant submits in para no.11 of the complaint that the accused allegedly created third party right in respect of the said land. The complainant has submits that accused has deliberately cheated him and deprived his right, -- 1 of 2 -- share, title, interest claim etc in the properties. The complainant was directed to argue on jurisdiction of this court, but despite of giving opportunity, the complainant and his advocate unable to assign any reason showing jurisdiction of this court to continue with the complaint. Even jurisdiction of this court is not mentioned anywhere in the complaint. This court has no jurisdiction. This court is not competent to take cognizance in this case. In the result, the complaint is return to the complainant to present it in proper court under section 201 of the Code of Criminal Procedure Code. (N. V. Bansal) Metropolitan Magistrate, Railway Mobile Court, Date : 14/09/2022 Andheri, Mumbai. -- 2 of 2 --
