Summons Private cases SS
MS INNFOFIN SOLUTIONS PVT LTDVsPANKAJ KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
CNR MHMM19008001201944-Judicial Magistrate (First Class), 44th Court
Andheri, MM Court
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--DISMISSED
Decision Date: 02nd March 2024
TrustJury record updated 01 Oct 2026
Case Overview
- Registration Number
- 4402241/2019
- Registration Date
- 17 Jun 2019
Advocates
1For Petitioner
For Respondent
Not available
Parties
2Petitioner
Respondent
Acts & Sections
1DRUGS AND COSMETICS ACT · Sec 138
Case History / Proceedings
Case History
Date: 21-10-2019 Business: Today is declare a holiday on account of VIDHANSABHA ELECTION. Hence, Board discharged. Next Purpose: FOR VERIFICATION Next Hearing Date: 23-11-2019 Date: 23-11-2019 Business: Ld. M.M. is on Leave. Hence Board is discharged. Charged with M.M. 63th Court, Mumbai. Next Purpose: FOR VERIFICATION Next Hearing Date: 07-02-2020 Date: 07-02-2020 Business: Complainant absent. Adv is present and pray for date. Hence, Adj Next Purpose: FOR VERIFICATION Next Hearing Date: 08-04-2020 Date: 08-04-2020 Reason For Adjournment: Lockdown extended upto 3rd May 2020 Next Purpose: FOR VERIFICATION Next Hearing Date: 08-05-2020 Date: 08-05-2020 Business: as per high Court order board is discharged Next Purpose: FOR VERIFICATION Next Hearing Date: 22-07-2020 Date: 22-07-2020 Business: As per High Court Order Board is Discharged Next Purpose: FOR VERIFICATION Next Hearing Date: 17-12-2020 Date: 17-12-2020 Business: Complainant ab. Adv ab. Adj Next Purpose: FOR VERIFICATION Next Hearing Date: 19-04-2021 Date: 19-04-2021 Business: due to covid 19 board is discharge as per direction Next Purpose: FOR VERIFICATION Next Hearing Date: 14-07-2021 Date: 14-07-2021 Business: As per the guideline given by Honble High Court in Standard Operating Procedure to prevent transmission of the second wave of coivd-19 virus, and order of Honble C.M.M, Court start functioning from 15-06-2021 from 11 am to 2.00 pm. And Only urgent matters will be dealt with. That is why other board are being discharged. Next Purpose: FOR VERIFICATION Next Hearing Date: 21-11-2021 Date: 21-11-2021 Business: Today is holiday. Hence, Adj Next Purpose: FOR VERIFICATION Next Hearing Date: 31-12-2021 Date: 31-12-2021 Business: Ld M.M. is on leave. Hence, Board Discharged . Charge with M.M.65th Court. Next Purpose: FOR VERIFICATION Next Hearing Date: 25-03-2022 Date: 25-03-2022 Business: parties are absent Next Purpose: FOR VERIFICATION Next Hearing Date: 25-07-2022 Date: 25-07-2022 Business: Board is discharged. 29-03-2023 Next Purpose: FOR VERIFICATION Next Hearing Date: 29-03-2023 Date: 29-03-2023 Business: Complainant and his advocate are absent when matter is called out. 21-07-2023 Next Purpose: FOR VERIFICATION Next Hearing Date: 21-07-2023 Date: 21-07-2023 Business: Complainant and his advocate are absent when matter is called out. 22-11-2023 Next Purpose: FOR VERIFICATION Next Hearing Date: 22-11-2023 Date: 22-11-2023 Business: Complainant and his advocate are absent when matter is called out. For steps. Next Purpose: For Steps Next Hearing Date: 02-03-2024 Date: 02-03-2024 Business: Complainant and his advocate are absent when matter is called out. No steps are taken since long. Complainant is dismissed. For reason separately recorded. Hence disposed. Nature Of Disposal: DISMISSED Disposal Date: 02-03-2024
Additional Case Details
Additional Case Details
Filing Number: 8008799/2019 Filing Date: 17-06-2019 First Hearing Date: 21st October 2019 Decision Date: 02nd March 2024 Court Number And Judge: 44-Judicial Magistrate (First Class), 44th Court
Orders
1Final Order 102 Mar 2024
02 Mar 2024
Order Details: Order below Ex-1 Pdf Text: IN THE COURT OF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE, 44TH COURT, ANDHERI, MUMBAI. C.C. No.2241/SS/2019 M/S. INNOFIN SOLUTIONS PVT. LTD., Through Authorized Representative Mr. Pratik Kharel, …. Complainant V/s. PANKAJ KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, …. Accused ORDER BELOW EXHIBIT NO.1 (Passed on 02/03/2024) The present case on hand came to be filed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. 2. Having gone through the roznama and case papers, it appears that the complainant is absent since long time. Moreover, no positive step was taken by the complainant within a span of last four years. Thus, this case is unattended. In such circumstances, it appears that the case comes within the ambit of stale and ineffective case. Hence, having regard to the pendency of the case, it requires to be disposed of in the Special Drive. Resultantly, I pass the following order: ORDER i] The case is dismissed for want of prosecution. ii] The original documents filed in this case be returned to the concerned parties. iii] The case be closed accordingly. Sd/ (Sujitkumar C. Tayde) Metropolitan Magistrate, Date: 02/03/2024 44th Court, Andheri, Mumbai. spj -- 1 of 1 --
TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.
