Date: 27-11-2018
Business: Ld. App present
Both accused present
For charge
Next Purpose: NOT HEARD CASES
Next Hearing Date: 21-06-2019
Date: 21-06-2019
Business: Ld. App absent
Both accused present
For charge
Next Purpose: NOT HEARD CASES
Next Hearing Date: 16-10-2019
Date: 16-10-2019
Business: Ld. App present
Both accused present. Adv. P.A.Shetty filed VP for both accused
Charge is framed against both accused for the offences U/s. 324, 504, 506 r/w 34 IPC (Exh.P-2)
Particulars of charge are explained to both accused in vernacular language
Plea of both accused is recorded (Exh.P-3)
Both accused plead not guilty to charge
Their plea is accepted
Issue summons to witness
For evidence
Next Purpose: FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 23-10-2019
Date: 23-10-2019
Business: Ld. App absent
In charge Ld.App present
Both accused present with adv. Shetty
Witness present
P.W.No.1 on SA (Exh.P-4)
Name - Ejaj A. Shaikh
Age - 32 years
Occ - Driver
R/o - Juhu, Mumbai
Exam in chief by Ld. App for prosecution
At this stage Ld. App requested for cross exam of witness as he is not supporting prosecution. It is allowed
Cross exam by Ld.App for prosecution
Cross exam by Ld. Adv. P.A.Shetty for both accused
Cross over
no re-exam
For further evidence
Next Purpose: PART HEARD
Next Hearing Date: 15-11-2019
Date: 15-11-2019
Business: As Ld. MM is on customs duty, hence case is adjourned
For evidence
Next Purpose: PART HEARD
Next Hearing Date: 03-01-2020
Date: 03-01-2020
Business: Ld. App present
Both accused present with adv.
Witness present
P.W.No.2 on SA (Exh.P-5)
Name - Shaikh A. Azam
Age - 37 years
Occ - Electrician
R/o - Andheri (W), Mumbai
Exam in chief by Ld. App for prosecution
At this stage Ld. App requested for cross examination of witness as he is not supporting prosecution case. It is allowed
Cross exam by Ld. App for prosecution
Cross exam by Ld. Adv. Shetty for both accused
Declined
cross over
no re-exam
P.W.No.3 on SA (Exh.P-6)
Name - Smt. Sultana A.Shaikh
Age - 32 years
Occ - Beautician
R/o - Andheri (W), Mumbai
Exam in chief by Ld. App for prosecution
At this stage Ld. App requested for cross examination of witness as he is not supporting prosecution case. It is allowed
Cross exam by Ld. App for prosecution
Cross exam by Ld. Adv. Shetty for both accused
Declined
cross over
no re-exam
Both sides filed pursis stating that they have settled the amicably between them and the complainant do not want to proceed with the matter (Exh.P-7)
Order passed separately below exh.P-1 and with the consent of Ld. App prosecution evidence is closed Statement of accused u/s. 313Cr.PC is dispensed with as no material evidence has come record against accused
Arguments heard from both sides
Judgment pronounced in open court
Order passed separately (Exh.P-8)
As per order passed, both accused are acquitted of the offences u/s. 324, 504, 506 r/w 34 IPC vide sec.248(1) Cr.PC. Their bail bonds stands cancelled.
Both accused shall furnish bonds of Rs.10000/- each u/s. 437(A) Cr.PC.
Muddemal property i.e. wooden bamboo, being worthless, be destroyed after appeal period is over.
All the court fee stamps in this case by duly cancelled
Nature Of Disposal: JUDGMENT
Disposal Date: 03-01-2020