Skip to main content
Domestic Violence

RESHMA SALIM SHAIKHVsSALIM YUSUF SHAIKH AND OTHERS +2 more

CNR MHMM19007279201866-Judicial Magistrate (First Class), 66th Court
Metropolitan Magistrate, Andheri, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--DISMISSED
Decision Date: 20th February 2021

TrustJury record updated 24 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
196/2018
Registration Date
12 Jul 2018

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    4

    Petitioner

    1. 1RESHMA SALIM SHAIKH

    Respondent

    1. 1SALIM YUSUF SHAIKH AND OTHERS
    2. 2MOHD. YUSUF USMAN SHAIKH
    3. 3JULEKHA USMAN SHAIKH

    Acts & Sections

    1
    CHILD LABOUR (PROHIBITION AND REGULATION) ACT · Sec 12 · 18 · 19 · 22

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 09-08-2018
Business: Applicant pt. Adv. pt.
Notice report awaited.
Next Purpose: DV CASES
Next Hearing Date: 07-09-2018

Date: 07-09-2018
Business: Complainant present with Adv.
Exh-        . Application for Extension of time to serve summons through P.O.
Next Purpose: DV CASES
Next Hearing Date: 12-10-2018

Date: 12-10-2018
Business: Resumed today
Ld. APP is present
Both the parties are absent.
Advocate for applicant is absent
Next Purpose: DV CASES
Next Hearing Date: 07-12-2018

Date: 07-12-2018
Business: Resumed today
Ld APP is present
Both the parties and advocates are present
Next Purpose: DV CASES
Next Hearing Date: 30-01-2019

Date: 30-01-2019
Business: Resumed today
Ld. APP is absent
Both the parties and advocates are absent
Next Purpose: DV CASES
Next Hearing Date: 26-03-2019

Date: 26-03-2019
Business: Resumed today
Ld APP is present
Both the parties and advocates are absent when repeatedly called,
Next Purpose: DV CASES
Next Hearing Date: 06-05-2019

Date: 06-05-2019
Next Purpose: DV CASES
Next Hearing Date: 15-06-2019

Date: 15-06-2019
Business: Both parties are absent
Next Purpose: NOT HEARD CASES
Next Hearing Date: 25-07-2019

Date: 25-07-2019
Business: Ld. M.M. is on Leave, Hence Board Discharged, Charged with Ld. M.M. Railway Mobile Court.
Next Purpose: NOT HEARD CASES
Next Hearing Date: 18-09-2019

Date: 18-09-2019
Business: Both parties are absent.
Next Purpose: NOT HEARD CASES
Next Hearing Date: 05-12-2019

Date: 05-12-2019
Business: Both parties absent for steps
Next Purpose: NOT HEARD CASES
Next Hearing Date: 23-01-2020

Date: 23-01-2020
Business: Both parties absent for steps.
Next Purpose: NOT HEARD CASES
Next Hearing Date: 12-03-2020

Date: 12-03-2020
Business: Applicant Absent
Ld. Adv. for Applicant Absent
Respondent Absent
Ld. Adv. for Respondent Absent
Next Purpose: NOT HEARD CASES
Next Hearing Date: 11-05-2020

Date: 11-05-2020
Business: Board discharged. In view of circular from Honble P.D.J. bearing No. 66/2020. case is adjourned.
Reason For Adjournment: National Lock Down
Next Purpose: NOT HEARD CASES
Next Hearing Date: 05-11-2020

Date: 05-11-2020
Business: Board Discharged
Reason For Adjournment: Adjourned due to Covid-19
Next Purpose: NOT HEARD CASES
Next Hearing Date: 05-01-2021

Date: 05-01-2021
Business: Both parties ab.
For steps.
Next Purpose: NOT HEARD CASES
Next Hearing Date: 20-02-2021

Date: 20-02-2021
Business: Both parties ab. for steps
Petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution.
Separate order passed below Exh. 1.
Proceeding is closed.
Nature Of Disposal: DISMISSED
Disposal Date: 20-02-2021

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 8628/2018
Filing Date: 12-07-2018
First Hearing Date: 09th August 2018
Decision Date: 20th February 2021
Court Number And Judge: 66-Judicial Magistrate (First Class), 66th Court

    Orders

    1
    Final Order 1
    20 Feb 2021
    Order Details: Order below Ex-1
Pdf Text: MHMM190072792018
IN THE COURT OF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE
66TH COURT, ANDHERI, MUMBAI
C.C. NO. 196/DV/2018
Mrs. Reshma Salim Shaikh ... Aggrieved person
v/s.
Mr. Salim Yusuf Shaikh & Ors. ... Respondents
ORDER BELOW EXH.1
Perused the record and proceeding. None is present when
called for. Present petition is filed as per the provisions of The
Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act for various reliefs.
Aggrieved person failed to take further steps in the matter. Respondent
nos. 1 and 2 are not properly served. Long absence of aggrieved person
and her Ld. Advocate show that they are not interested to proceed with
the matter. Matter remains unattended since long. Therefore, I find no
any reason to adjourn matter further. Hence, matter needs to be
dismissed for want of prosecution. Hence, the order:
O R D E R
1. Petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution.
2. Proceeding be closed.
Date : 20/02/2021 (Bhagawat T. Zirape)
Metropolitan Magistrate
66th Court, Andheri, Mumbai
-- 1 of 1 --

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.