Full Order Text
Interim Order 2 · 15 Jan 2021 · CNR MHMM190069012018
Order Details: Order Pdf Text: IN THE COURT OF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE 66TH COURT, ANDHERI, MUMBAI C.C. NO. 2605/SS/2018 Ajay Jajodia ...Complainant v/s. Pooja Raikar & Ors. ...Accused ORDER BELOW EXH.48 1. Complainant Ajay Jajodia and accused no. 1 to 3 are present before the court. Advocate of the accused absent. Present original complaint is filed by complainant for the offences punishable under sectoins 500, 501, 504, 506 r/w 34, 114 and 120-B of IPC. Present application-cum-complainant is sent by complainant by Speed Post to this court. Envelope of Speed Post is at Exh.45. Complainant Ajay Jajodiya made wild allegations against presiding officer of this court for the best reasons known to him. He circulated this complaint to the other Judicial Officers working at Andheri Center. Prima facie, the allegations in the complaint are scandaliess which tend to lower the authority of court. By sending such letter to presiding officer and other judicial officers working at same center amounts to criminal contempt within the meaning of Section 2 of The Contempt of Court Act. So also, allegations are defamatory in nature. 2. Therefore, contempt reference needs to be send to the Hon’ble High Court against the complainant Ajay Jajodia. At the same time, various offences of IPC attracts against the complainant. Therefore, proceeding also needs to be initiated against him for the offences punishable under the provisions of Indian Penal Code. However, before proceeding further against complainant, it is necessary to call say of complainant again. So, show cause notices needs to be issued against him calling his explanation. Detailed order in respect of sending contempt reference and lodging criminal complaint can be passed after going through the say of complainant lateron. Today, -- 1 of 2 -- complainant filed application for expediate of the matter. In it, he stated that he would like to withdraw the complaint filed against this presiding officer before the Vigillance Officer, Bombay High Court Mumbai. Submission of complainant in application Exh.56 appears to be not genuine. In this view of matter, I proceed to pass following order: O R D E R 1. Issue show cause notice against complainant Ajay Jajodia as to why contempt reference under section 15 (2) of Contempt of Court Act should not be sent to Hon’ble Bombay High Court against him on count of sending and circulating present complaint against the presiding officer of this court r/o 04/02/2021. 2. Issue show cause notice against complainant Ajay Jajodia as to why proceeding as per the provisions of Indian Penal Code should not be initiated against him as observed above r/o 04/02/2021. (Bhagawat T. Zirape) Dated : 15/01/2021 Metropolitan Magistrate, 66th Court, Andheri, Mumbai. -- 2 of 2 --
