Full Order Text
Final Order 1 · 26 Feb 2020 · CNR MHMM190061962018
Order Details: Order Pdf Text: 1 ORDER BELOW NOTICE BEARING NO.787/N/18 IN C.R.NO.144/2016 OF VILEPARLE POLICE STATION, MUMBAI. Nirmal Bang Securities Private Limited. ...... Applicant. V/s The state of Maharashtra above Police station, ...... Respondent O R D E R (Dated 26/02/2020) 1) The applicant has filed this application for return of property. It is submission of applicant that accused No.1 Jaiprakash was working with the applicant company as Relationship Manager. Accused has purchased in all 1,92,100 shares of Symbiox Investment and Trading Company Ltd @ Rs.26 per share of total worth Rs.49,94,600/in three different accounts belonging to Ashish Lalpura, Mukund Darak and Gajanan Kulkarni in BSE Settlement No.1617022. But after inquiry the applicant came to know that said shares were unauthorizedly purchased by the accused No.1 & not by above three persons. Therefore, applicant has filed FIR against accused No.1 at Vileparle police station. The respondent No.2 i.e. BSE Limited stayed the settlement procedure and blocked an amount of Rs.49,94,600/ of the applicant towards said transaction. The accused has fraudulently transacted in three different accounts and the amounts were debited in said accounts on refusal of respective clients, the applicant has already reversed the debit amounts and transferred said debit amounts to applicant's company's own -- 1 of 3 -- 2 account. Therefore, the applicant company is rightful owner of the said amount which is locked and seized by the respondent No.2. The applicant can put the money to the better use if the same are returned to the applicant. Hence prayed to allow the application and directions be given to the respondent No.2 to release the amount of Rs.49,94,600/ to the applicant company. 2) The respondent No.1 i.e. Vileparle police station has filed its say and given no objection to allow the application on terms and conditions. Despite of service of notice to the respondent No.2 BSE Limited, it has failed to appear before the Court, hence application is proceeded exparte against it. Ld APP has filed his say & submitted that necessary order may be kindly passed. 3) In this matter, say of accused was called. Accused No.2 has filed his say and given no objection for allowing the application. Accused No.1 has filed his say and objected for allowing the application. Accused No.1 by filing his say has submitted that three clients of applicant company namely Ashish Lalpura, Mukund Darak and Gajanan Kulkarni are rightful claimants of said amounts and therefore objection for allowing the application. Therefore, my Learned Predecessor has also called say of above three clients. Above three clients are appeared in this matter and they have filed their say and given no objection for allowing the application. 4) Considering above discussion, I come to the conclusion that the applicant company is rightful claimant of the amount mentioned in the application. The applicant company is ready to abide any terms and conditions if imposed on it. If the amount is released, it will not affect -- 2 of 3 -- 3 the rights of any party. Therefore, application is liable to be allowed with some conditions. Hence I pass following order : ORDER 1) Application is allowed. 2) Respondent No.2 BSE Limited is hereby directed to release the amount of Rs. 49,94,600/ to the applicant company as per procedure. 3) Applicant is hereby directed to deposit the value of said amount in the Court as and when directed. (C.P. Kashid) Metropolitan Magistrate, Date : 26.02.2020 65th Court, Andheri, Mumbai. ask -- 3 of 3 --
