Skip to main content
Domestic Violence

SONALI ARUN MISHRAVsARUN UDAYRAJ MISHRA AND OTHER +1 more

CNR MHMM19003962201866-Judicial Magistrate (First Class), 66th Court
Metropolitan Magistrate, Andheri, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--DISMISSED
Decision Date: 28th February 2020

TrustJury record updated 23 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
46/2018
Registration Date
03 Feb 2018

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    3

    Petitioner

    1. 1SONALI ARUN MISHRA

    Respondent

    1. 1ARUN UDAYRAJ MISHRA AND OTHER
    2. 2SARITA UDAYRAJ MISHRA

    Acts & Sections

    1
    CHILD LABOUR (PROHIBITION AND REGULATION) ACT · Sec 12 · 18 · 19 · 20 · 21 · 22

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 26-03-2018
Business: for steps
Next Purpose: NOT HEARD CASES
Next Hearing Date: 20-04-2018

Date: 20-04-2018
Business: Ld. M.M is on concessional leave.
 Board discharged.
Next Purpose: NOT HEARD CASES
Next Hearing Date: 28-05-2018

Date: 28-05-2018
Business: Applicant Pt. Adv. pt.
Respondent absent.
Exh-05 Notice report.
Next Purpose: NOT HEARD CASES
Next Hearing Date: 09-07-2018

Date: 09-07-2018
Business: Applicant present with Adv.Present.
Respondent are absent. Adv. Absent.
Order bexlow Exh-1
Application proceed exparte against him.
Next dt. 29-08-2018
C.C.No. 46/DV/2018
Next Purpose: NOT HEARD CASES
Next Hearing Date: 29-08-2018

Date: 29-08-2018
Business: Applicant pt. Adv. pt.
Responder abt.
Exh-06 Adv. for applicant filed application for adjournment, allowed.
Next Purpose: NOT HEARD CASES
Next Hearing Date: 11-10-2018

Date: 11-10-2018
Business: Resumed today
Ld. APP is present
Both the parties and advocates are absent
Next Purpose: NOT HEARD CASES
Next Hearing Date: 05-12-2018

Date: 05-12-2018
Business: Resumed today
Ld APP is absent
Both the parties are absent
Advocate for applicant is present
Next Purpose: NOT HEARD CASES
Next Hearing Date: 17-01-2019

Date: 17-01-2019
Business: Resumed today
Ld APP is present
Both the parties are absent. Advocate for applicant is present today
Next Purpose: NOT HEARD CASES
Next Hearing Date: 02-03-2019

Date: 02-03-2019
Business: Resumed today
Ld APP is present
Both the parties and advocates are absent when repeatedly called
Next Purpose: NOT HEARD CASES
Next Hearing Date: 24-04-2019

Date: 24-04-2019
Business: Resumed today
Ld APP is present
Both the parties and advocates are absent when repeatedly called.
Next Purpose: NOT HEARD CASES
Next Hearing Date: 27-06-2019

Date: 27-06-2019
Business: Both parties are absent.
Next Purpose: NOT HEARD CASES
Next Hearing Date: 02-08-2019

Date: 02-08-2019
Business: Both parties are absent.
Next Purpose: NOT HEARD CASES
Next Hearing Date: 17-09-2019

Date: 17-09-2019
Business: Both parties are absent.
Next Purpose: NOT HEARD CASES
Next Hearing Date: 05-12-2019

Date: 05-12-2019
Business: Both parties absent
For steps
Next Purpose: NOT HEARD CASES
Next Hearing Date: 21-01-2020

Date: 21-01-2020
Business: Applicant absent adv. pt.  Resp. ab adv. ab. Requested date
Next Purpose: NOT HEARD CASES
Next Hearing Date: 28-02-2020

Date: 28-02-2020
Business: Both Parties absent.  Application stands dismissed for want of prosecution.  Proceeding is closed.  Case is disposed off.   Order passed separately.
Nature Of Disposal: DISMISSED
Disposal Date: 28-02-2020

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 2351/2018
Filing Date: 03-02-2018
First Hearing Date: 26th March 2018
Decision Date: 28th February 2020
Court Number And Judge: 66-Judicial Magistrate (First Class), 66th Court

    Orders

    1
    Final Order 1
    28 Feb 2020
    Order Details: Order
Pdf Text: IN THE COURT OF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE
66TH COURT, ANDHERI, MUMBAI
C.C. NO.46/DV/2018
Sonali Arun Mishra ... Aggrieved Person
v/s.
Arun Udayraj Mishra & Ors. ... Respondent
ORDER BELOW EXH.1
Perused the record and proceeding. None is present when
called for. Present petition is filed as per the provisions of Domestic
Violence Act for various reliefs. Aggrieved person has not taken further
steps. Long absence of aggrieved person and her Ld. Advocate shows
that they are not interested to proceed with the matter. I find no any
reason to adjourn matter further. Hence, matter needs to be dismissed
for want of prosecution. Hence, the order:
O R D E R
1. Application stands dismissed for want of prosecution.
2. Proceeding be closed.
Date : 28/02/2020 (Bhagawat T. Zirape)
Metropolitan Magistrate
66th Court, Andheri, Mumbai
-- 1 of 1 --

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.