Full Order Text
Final Order 1 · 14 Jan 2022 · CNR MHMM190013102018
Order Details: Copy of Judgment Pdf Text: 1 C. C. NO. 130/PW/2018 (Judgment) MHMM190013102018 Received on : 10/01/2018, Registered on : 10/01/2018, Decided on : 14/01/2022, Duration : 04 Y. 00 M. 04 D. Exh. : 05 IN THE COURT OF THE METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE, RAILWAY MOBILE COURT, ANDHERI, MUMBAI. (PRESIDED OVER BY IMRAN R. MARCHIYA) (JUDGMENT U/SEC. 355 OF CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE) (a) The serial No. of the case; : 130/PW/2018 (b) The date of commission of the offence; : 29/01/2017 (c) The name of the complainant (if any); : The State (Meghwadi Police Station in C. R. No. 29/2017). (d) The name of the accused persons and their parentage and residence; : 1. Asif Abdul Mannan Shaikh, Age : 36 Yrs. Occ. : Driver, 2. Wasim Abdul Mannan Shaikh, Age : 22 Yrs. Occ. : Garment work, Both accused R/o : Room No. 02, Musa Zaveri Chawl, New Andheri Plot, Jogeshwari (East), Mumbai. -- 1 of 6 -- 2 C. C. NO. 130/PW/2018 (Judgment) (e) The offences complained of or proved ; : Under Sections 324 and 504 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. (f) The plea of the accused and their examination (if any); : The accused pleaded not guilty. (g) The final order; : The accused are acquitted. (h) The date of such order; : 14/01/2022, Mr. Shah, APP for the State. Mr. Kerkar, Advocate for the accused. J U D G M E N T (Delivered on 14/01/2022) 1. The accused are prosecuted for the offences punishable under Sections 324 and 504 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. 2. In brief, it is the case of the prosecution that the informant Asif Nasruddin Shaikh and the accused are residents of same area. The accused are brothers. On 29/01/2017 at about 10.20 p.m. the accused picked the quarrel with the informant on the count of parking the motorcycle by the informant in the lane of the house. Both the accused hurled abuses against the informant. They also started to beat him. Accused no.1 gave fist blow on the face of the informant. At that time some hard article was in the hand of accused no.1. Due to which the informant sustained injury on his right cheek. After the incident initially the informant went to Cooper hospital for medical treatment and thereafter he went to police station Meghwadi and lodged report against the accused. -- 2 of 6 -- 3 C. C. NO. 130/PW/2018 (Judgment) 3. On the basis of the report given by the informant, crime no. 29/2017 came to be registered against the accused. The accused came to be arrested. During investigation I.O. visited spot of the incident and drawn spot panchanama there. During further investigation I.O. collected injury report of the informant and recorded statement of the witnesses. After completion of investigation, he filed chargesheet. 4. I framed charge (Exh.2) against the accused for the above mentioned offences. The accused pleaded not guilty and claimed to be tried. The prosecution has examined only the informant. As no any incriminating evidence came on record during evidence of the prosecution, statement of the accused under Section 313 of the Code of Criminal Procedure came to be dispensed with. 5. The points for determination alongwith my findings thereon as under : POINTS FINDINGS 1] Does the prosecution prove that the accused voluntarily caused hurt to the informant by means of dangerous weapon ? No. 2] Does the prosecution prove that the accused intentionally insulted the informant ? No. 3] What order ? The accused are acquitted. -- 3 of 6 -- 4 C. C. NO. 130/PW/2018 (Judgment) REASONS AS TO POINT NOS. 1 TO 2 : 6. These points are interconnected with each other, therefore, they are taken up together for consideration and determination. 7. The informant Asif Shaikh (P.W.1) deposes at Exh. P04 that the accused are residents of his area. The incident took place in the year 2017 during night time near his house. At the time of the incident heated argument had taken place between him and few persons of the area due to reason of parking of motorcycle. He had given report of the said incident to police. F.I.R. dt. 31/01/2017 bears his signature, but he is not aware about it’s contents. The informant has not supported the case of prosecution. In the crossexamination by learned APP, the informant denied that at the time of the incident on 29/01/2017 at about 10.20 p.m. the accused quarreled with him due to reason of parking of motorcycle and at that time both the accused hurled abuses against him and accused no. 1 gave a blow of hard object on his face and due to which he sustained injury to his right cheek. In the cross examination by the defence side, the informant stated that due to compromise he does not want to proceed with the matter. He want to close the matter. 8. I have gone through the record. The case is more than 04 years old. The prosecution has examined only the informant and he has not supported the case of prosecution. The informant has filed compromise pursis (Exh. 03) on record. From the record it is clear that due to compromise between the parties, the informant has not stated anything against the accused. No any incriminating evidence against the accused came on record in the evidence of the prosecution. The prosecution failed to prove the charges -- 4 of 6 -- 5 C. C. NO. 130/PW/2018 (Judgment) levelled against the accused. Hence, I answer point nos. 1 and 2 in the negative. AS TO POINT NO. 3 : 9. The prosecution failed to prove guilt of the accused. Therefore, the accused are liable to be acquitted. In the result, in answer to point no. 3, I pass the following order. ORDER 1] The accused are acquitted of the offences punishable under Sections 324 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code vide Section 248 (1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. 2] Bail bond of the accused stands cancelled and they be set at liberty. 3] The accused to execute P. R. Bond of Rs. 15,000/ each with one solvent surety vide Section 437 – A of the Code of Criminal Procedure for appearance before the higher court, if said court issues notice to them for their appearance in the matter in which present judgment is challenged, if any. Sd/ Place : Mumbai. Date : 14/01/2022. (Imran R. Marchiya) Metropolitan Magistrate, Railway Mobile Court, Andheri, Mumbai. -- 5 of 6 -- 6 C. C. NO. 130/PW/2018 (Judgment) Dictated On : 14/01/2022, Transcribed On : 14/01/2022, Checked and Signed On : 14/01/2022, -- 6 of 6 --
