Skip to main content
Summary Cases

Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited through its representative Mr Dipesh Laxman KambleVsMANISHA SUDAM VALVE +1 more

CNR MHMM18014702202558-JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE FIRST CLASS 58TH COURT
Additional Metropolitan Magistrate, Bandra, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
PENDING

TrustJury record updated 30 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
658/2025
Registration Date
03 Nov 2025
Next Hearing Date
21 Oct 2026
Case Stage
FOR VERIFICATION

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    3

    Petitioner

    1. 1Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited through its representative Mr Dipesh Laxman Kamble

    Respondent

    1. 1MANISHA SUDAM VALVE
    2. 2Sudam Sopan Valve

    Acts & Sections

    1
    NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT · Sec 138

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 27-11-2025
Business: Ld. JMFC is on leave charge with Ld. JMFC 71st court. Hence board is discharge. adj for
Next Purpose: FOR VERIFICATION
Next Hearing Date: 12-01-2026

Date: 12-01-2026
Business: called on today complainant absent and his advocate present.
adj for verification.
Next Purpose: FOR VERIFICATION
Next Hearing Date: 27-03-2026

Date: 27-03-2026
Business: Called on today compliant absent and his  advocate present
adj for. verification.
Next Purpose: FOR VERIFICATION
Next Hearing Date: 20-07-2026

Date: 20-07-2026
Business: called on today. complainant present and his advocate present.
application for substitution. allowed.
adj. for verification.
Next Purpose: FOR VERIFICATION
Next Hearing Date: 21-10-2026

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 7011955/2025
Filing Date: 17-09-2025
eFiling Number: AMH20230018746C202500104
eFiling Date: 25-08-2025
First Hearing Date: 27th November 2025
Court Number And Judge: 58-JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE FIRST CLASS 58TH COURT

    Orders

    2
    Interim Order 1
    20 Jul 2026
    Order Details: Order Below EX 1
Pdf Text: Case Nos.653 to 658/SC/2025
ORDER BELOW EXHIBIT- 10
Perused the application. Heard Learned Advocate for
the complainant. Perused the authorization letter issued in favor
of authorised officer. Now, the officer of complainant’s company
is changed. In the interest of justice, opportunity needs to be
given to conduct the proceeding to the new appointed officer.
No prejudice would cause to the accused. Hence, substitution is
permitted. Complainant to comply accordingly.
Sd/-
(B.S. Sankpal)
Judicial Magistrate (First Class)
Date : 20.07.2026 58th Court, Bandra, Mumbai.
SBA/-
-- 1 of 1 --
    Order 1
    20 Jul 2026
    Order Details: Order Below EX 1
Pdf Text: Case Nos.653 to 658/SC/2025
ORDER BELOW EXHIBIT- 10
Perused the application. Heard Learned Advocate for
the complainant. Perused the authorization letter issued in favor
of authorised officer. Now, the officer of complainant’s company
is changed. In the interest of justice, opportunity needs to be
given to conduct the proceeding to the new appointed officer.
No prejudice would cause to the accused. Hence, substitution is
permitted. Complainant to comply accordingly.
Sd/-
(B.S. Sankpal)
Judicial Magistrate (First Class)
Date : 20.07.2026 58th Court, Bandra, Mumbai.
SBA/-
-- 1 of 1 --

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.