Interim Order 2

Order Details: Copy of Document.
Pdf Text: 9 C.C.No.1822/SS/2018
CW-1 Exh.05
15. Whatever stated by me in my evidence affidavit is true
and correct and in token thereof I have signed the affidavit.
(M. P. Saraf)
Date : 29.11.2024 Judicial Magistrate(First Class),
58th Court, Bandra, Mumbai.
Cross examination of CW-01- Mr. Mahendra Tukaram Fadekle by
advocate Mr. Ali Saheb Shaikh for the accused :
16. I am studied upto 10th Std. I can read, write and understand
English language. I know what is written in my notice, complaint and
evidence affidavit.
17. I am a Gym Trainer since beginning that is prior to 15 years.
In the year 2016-2017 and 2018, I was serving with Nanavati College
as a Fitness Teacher. I was getting monthly salary of Rs.9,000/- per
month approximately. In my family my wife, my son and daughter are
the only family members. My wife is also doing cooking job. She is also
earning approximately Rs.10,000/- per month. Monthly expenditure of
my family is approximately below Rs.25,000/-. It is true to say that I
have not mentioned in my notice about the date, month and year of
giving Rs.2 lakhs to the accused. I have given Rs.2 lakhs at a time. It is
true to say that I have not mentioned the specific period for returning
Rs.2 lakhs by the accused to me in my notice. It is true to say that in my
complaint I have not written specifically that accused is my friend or
relative. It is true to say that I have not mentioned in my complaint that
since when I am acquainted with the accused. It is true to say that
accused is not staying in the vicinity of place of abode. It is true to say
that I have not stated in my complaint about the profession of the
accused. It is true to say that I have not stated about the earning source
-- 1 of 3 --
10 C.C.No.1822/SS/2018
CW-1 Exh.05
of accused in my complaint. It is true to say that I have not stated the
income source of accused in complaint. It is true to say that I have not
stated where and when I came in contact of the accused. It is true to
say that I have not stated in my complaint since when I am knowing
the accused. It is true to say that I have not produced any document to
show that I gave Rs.2 lakhs to the accused.
18. I am Income Tax Payer. I have shown giving Rs.2 lakhs to the
accused in Income Tax Returns. I can produce the Income Tax Returns.
Now I am shown cheque Exh.21. It is true to say that the ink of
signature over cheque and ink of the hand written contents is different.
It is true to say that there is no signature of bank officer on the cheque
return memo Exh.24 now shown to me.
On oral request of the advocate for the accused cross
examination is deferred till next date.
R.O.A.C.
(M. P. Saraf)
Date : 29.11.2024 Judicial Magistrate(First Class),
58th Court, Bandra, Mumbai.
J.O.Code :MH01362
-- 2 of 3 --
11 C.C.No.1822/SS/2018
CW-1 Exh.05
CERTIFICATE
I affirm that the contents of this P.D.F. file evidence are same, word to word as per
the original evidence.
Name of Stenographer : Mrs. Aditi Ravikiran Dalvi
Court : Judicial Magistrate(First Class), 58th Court, Bandra,
Mumbai.
Dictated in open court on : 29.11.2024.
Transcribed and Typed on : 29.11.2024.
Order printed and Signed on : 29.11.2024.
Order Uploaded on : 29.11.2024.
-- 3 of 3 --