Final Order 1

Order Details: Order Below EX 1
Pdf Text: C. C. No. 1914 Misc 2024 Neeta Vs State
CNR-MHMM18-012040-2024
COMMON ORDER BELOW EXHS.1, 6, 7 AND 8
1. Taken on board allowed. Applicant and her advocate absent.
Despite having no authority these applications filed by father of the
applicant, Miss Neeta Nazareth.
2. The brief facts leading to passing of this order can be summarized
in a sense that this court directed to transfer the amounts obtained by
fraudsters through the account of applicant, Miss Neeta Nazareth.
However, despite directions the banks not transferred the amount,
therefore, applicant filed this application for initiation of contempt
proceedings against those banks.
3. There are total 65 banks against which relief had been sought.
Those banks spread across India in various cities. But though reliefs
sought against them, none of the bank made respondent.
4. The main applicant and her advocate continuous absent. Her father
remains present and files several applications without any authority.
Considering the stake involved and in the interest of justice, after going
through the record on previous so many dates this court try to made
understand to the father of the applicant that this application is not proper
and the banks needs to be impleaded. But no purpose served and despite
understanding everything the father of the applicant playing tactics with
the court and deliberately killing it’s time. Today, same incidence
repeated and by way of this application the applicant/who is not present
before court sought amendment of the main application to insert the name
of all the banks in the title clause and issuance of notice to them, through
her father.
5. As the father of the applicant have no authority to file such
applications, all the applications are not tenable. Alternatively even if it is
Page - 1/2
-- 1 of 2 --
C. C. No. 1914 Misc 2024 Neeta Vs State
CNR-MHMM18-012040-2024
presumed that he can pursue the cause the applications are vague and not
supported by any affidavit as such basic requirements to allow
amendment are missing.
6. I am of the opinion that rather than doing this hectic exercise the
filing of fresh application by impleading all the 65 banks spread across
India as respondents, may serve some fruitful purpose to meet the ends of
justice. As such the main application itself needs to be disposed off by
giving permission to the applicant to apply a fresh by impleading banks
as respondents. Therefore, following order in the interest of justice -
ORDER
A. The applications, Exhs.7 and 8, are rejected.
B. The main application is also disposed off with a liberty to the
applicant to apply a fresh by impleading all the 65 banks and other
persons having interest in the matter as respondents.
C. Copy of this order shall be given free of cost to the applicant
through her father Mr. Thomas Nazareth.
MUMBAI (KOMALSING RAJPUT)
DATE – 30.05.2025 J.M.F.C., 12TH COURT, BANDRA, MUMBAI
Page - 2/2
-- 2 of 2 --