Skip to main content
Bail Application

West Cyber Police StationVsSujit Tanaji Patil

CNR MHMM18011892202512-JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE (FIRST CLASS), 12TH COURT
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--Bail Refused
Decision Date: 24th September 2025

TrustJury record updated 30 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
3477/2025
Registration Date
18 Sept 2025

Advocates

0

No advocate information is available in this record.

Parties

2

Acts & Sections

1
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita · Sec 204 · 205 · 318(4) · 319(2) · 336(2) · 336(3) · 338 · 340(2) · 61

Police / FIR Details

FIR Number / Year
182/2025

Case History / Proceedings

Case History
Date: 18-09-2025
Business: Called. APP present. Advocate for accused present. Bail application. APP to file say r/on 20/9/25.
Next Purpose: Inerim Hearing / Hearing Applications / Bail
Next Hearing Date: 20-09-2025

Date: 20-09-2025
Business: Called. APP present. Advocate for accused present. Argument heard. Adj for order.
Next Purpose: FOR ORDER
Next Hearing Date: 24-09-2025

Date: 24-09-2025
Business: Called. APP present.
Advocate for accused absent.
Order passed below Exh-1. Application is rejected.
Application is disposed off.
Nature Of Disposal: Bail Refused
Disposal Date: 24-09-2025

Additional Case Details

Additional Case Details
Filing Number: 3477/2025
Filing Date: 18-09-2025
First Hearing Date: 18th September 2025
Decision Date: 24th September 2025
Court Number And Judge: 12-JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE (FIRST CLASS), 12TH COURT

Orders

1
Final Order 1
24 Sept 2025
Order Details: Bail Order
Pdf Text: 2
IN THE COURT OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE FIRST CLASS,
12TH COURT, BANDRA, MUMBAI
Bail Application No.3477/BA/2025 C.R. No.182/2024,
Case No.2093/PW/2025 CYBER POLICE STATION (WEST DIVISION)
Order Below Bail Application
Perused bail application and say. Heard both side. Accused
Accused Mr. Sujeet Tanaji Patil is charged for the offence punishable
U/Secs.204, 205, 61, 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(2), 336(3), 340(2) of
the BNS and Sections 66-D of Information Technology Act. Prosecution
alleged that, accused have cheated the informant and misappropriated
Rs.2,89,00,000/-. Though the charge sheet is filed, the misappropriated
amount is huge. Offence is non-bailable. Therefore, considering the
nature of offence, the accused is not entitle to enlarge on bail.
Accordingly, I proceed to pass the following order -
ORDER
1. Application is rejected.
2. Intimation of this order be send to accused immediately
through the Superintendent of Jail.
(Girish S. Mane)
Mumbai Judicial Magistrate First Class,
Date : 24.09.2025 12th Court, Bandra, Mumbai
-- 1 of 1 --

TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.