Skip to main content
Court Order

Order 2

CNR MHMM18011046201804 Jul 2024
Back to Case

Full Order Text

Order 2 · 04 Jul 2024 · CNR MHMM180110462018

Order Details: Copy of Document.
Pdf Text: 24 C.C.No.1739/SS/2018
PW-01 Exh.5
Date : 04.07.2024
Resumed on oath :
Further cross examination of PW-01 Ashok Vohera @ Atul Kantilal
Adani by advocate Mr. Jayesh Kanani for the accused :
44. We have not maintained the minute book for the
year 2017-2018. It is true to say that complainant company has
not recorded the resolution referred in para 1 of my evidence
affidavit in any book of the company. I never demanded the
resolution as referred in my evidence affidavit para 1 from
complainant M/s. B.Atulkumar @ Company.
45. I do not know since which month and year BCON
studio LLP started the business. I never inquired with my daughter
Florence A Vohera as to since when she started the business in the
name of BCON Studio LLP with the accused. I do not know
anything about business of BCON Studio LLP. It is true to say that
my daughter or accused never contacted me in regards need of
loan or finance to BCON Studio LLP. It is true to say that I
personally has not done any transaction with BCON Studio LLP. I
do not know that my daughter was not possessing any experience
as to the business of BCON Studio LLP prior to year 2016. Witness
volunteers that I am in no way concerned with business of BCON
Studio LLP.
46. I am still maintaining relations with my daughter. I
have not asked my daughter about her transaction in regards
business with accused Nirav Parekh in the year 2016. It is true to
say that my daughter has also not told me what is business of
accused in the year 2016 and 2017.
-- 1 of 7 --
25 C.C.No.1739/SS/2018
PW-01 Exh.5
47. I never met Manjusha Jain and as such I do not
know about her. It is not that I first time heard name of Manjusha
Jain. Witness volunteers that Nirav often used to take the name. I
never asked accused as to why he is telling me about the name of
Manjusha Jain. It is true to say that accused has not given detailed
description information as to Manjusha Jain to me.
48. I do not know anything about Nandan Buildcon.
The name is not heard first time today by me. Witness volunteers
that accused used to tell about Nandan Buildcon. I never asked the
accused as to why he was telling me about Nandan Buildcon. I had
stated names of Manjusha Jain and Nandan Buildcon while giving
statement before BKC Police. I had given said statement in the
year 2018-2019. It is true to say that BKC Police has registered
crime against accused on my statement for the offence of cheating
against the accused. It is not true to say that in regards inquiry of
said crime I had taken my Chartered Accountant Viral Shah
various times to the Police Station. It is true to say that Viral Shah
has supplied documents to the police. Witness again states that he
do not remember but my C.A. has fulfilled the requirement of the
Police. Mr. Viral Shah is my Chartered Accountant even today.
Viral Shah did not asked any documents from me in respect of
complaint/report filed by me against the accused. It is true to say
that I had not personally given any documents to Mr. Viral Shah to
produce before police in inquiry. Witness volunteer that my all
documents are maintained by my Chartered Accountant. The Tax
Invoices produced at Exh.19 and 20 were not in the custody of
Viral Shah. It was in my custody. I do not know which documents
are produced by Viral Shah in the police station in respect of my
report against the accused. It is true to say that as on date I have
-- 2 of 7 --
26 C.C.No.1739/SS/2018
PW-01 Exh.5
not enquired anything about the same with Viral Shah.
49. 9820156789 is my mobile number for last 7 to 8
years. It is true to say that earlier complainant’s E-mail id was
batulkumar1@yahoo.co.in. Now I do not recollect whether it was
existing in the year 2017 and 2018. It is true to say that I used to
submit VAT return using my above mobile number. However, I do
not remember whether I used to submit VAT Returns under
reference of above referred E-mail id. I do not know in which year
or month I stopped using above E-mail id. I do not remember
whether I have deactivated or not the said E-mail id. I was using
two E-mail ids in the year 2017. I again states that I stopped using
above E-mail id after starting communication with new E-mail id
atuladani@gmail.com. I do not know whether I used to file VAT
Return using E-mail id atuladani@gmail.com. Myself or Viral Shah
was not submitting VAT Returns personally on line by using E-mail
id atuladani@gmail.com or batulkumar1@yahoo.co.in . It is true
to say that I was informed as and when the VAT Returns were
submitted. I do not know the name of person who submitted the
VAT Returns on behalf of complainant company in the year 2017.
The complainant company had appointed Chartered Accountant
for submitting VAT Returns in the year 2017. His name was Viral
Shah & Company. I do not remember that the last return for Atul
Kumar & Company came to be filed by Viral Shah & Company on
19.07.2017. I will collect the information whether the VAT Return
was filed or not on 19.07.2017 by Viral Shah and Company
positively till next date. I will produce the copy of VAT Return
submitted on 19.07.2017 if available in our record. I will have to
check our record whether the books of accounts as required to be
kept under commerce are available with us or not. I do not know
-- 3 of 7 --
27 C.C.No.1739/SS/2018
PW-01 Exh.5
whether the VAT Taxable Sell of B Atul Kumar & Company for the
period 01.04.2017 to 30.06.2017 was Rs.1,23,37,207/-. I do not
remember whether I had given information to Viral Shah &
Company as to sale of B Atul Kumar & Company to the tune of
Rs.1,23,37,207/-. I will tell about the same if the data is preserved
and available with us on the point of whether sell of such amount
was done or not during 01.04.2017 to 30.06.2017. It is true to say
that during aforesaid period the VAT Number displayed on Invoice
Exh.19 and 20 was in existence and in operation. It is true to say
that complainant company used to submit the VAT returns under
said VAT number.
50. I know about the Firm B. V. Brothers. I again say I
do not know about Firm B. V. Brothers. I know Dinesh Badgujar. In
the year 2017-2018 I had told above two names to Viral Shah. I
had told the name of B.V.Brothers and Dinesh Badgujar as a
customers of complainant company to Viral Shah. I mistakenly
stated that I do not know about firm B. V. Brothers. It is true to say
that in the year 2017 and 2018 B.V. Brothers were running
Diamond business. I do not remember their address in the year
2017-2018. We do not possess address of B. V. Brothers in our
records. I do not know which type Firm was the B.V. Brothers in
the year 2017-2018. I can not tell whether it was Proprietorship
Firm or Partnership Firm. I do not remember who was interacting
with complainant company on behalf of B.V. Brothers in the year
2017-2018.
51. It is possible that B Atul Kumar & Company has not
sold diamonds to more than three customers in between
01.04.2017 to 31.03.2018. I do not remember whether the two
-- 4 of 7 --
28 C.C.No.1739/SS/2018
PW-01 Exh.5
customers out of three were B. V. Brothers and Dinesh Badgujar. I
had stated the names of those three customers to Viral Shah for
preparing the Balance sheet of complainant company for the
relevant period. I do not remember whether I had told or not to
Mr. Viral Shah as to the gross turn over of sales of complainant
company for period 01.04.2017 to 31.03.2018 to the tune of
Rs.1,24,85,254/-. I do not remember whether goods worth
Rs.1,90,06,554/- and Rs.5,06,000/- were sold to B. V. Brothers
and Dinesh Badgujar respectively by the complainant company for
the period 01.04.2017 to 31.03.2018. I do not remember whether
in VAT Return for the period 01.04.2017 to 30.06.2017 is included
or not the goods sold to B. V. Brothers and Dinesh Badgujar. I can
not tell or give information about the same on next date.
52. It is true to say that complainant company has not
issued any bill with GST to the accused. I do not remember
whether complainant company was not aware about the VAT
number, CST number of accused till June, 2017. I do not know
VAT Number, CST number till today. I do not remember that I have
not asked or inquired the VAT and CST number of the accused
with him. It is true to say that I have not asked the VAT and CTS
number of the accused even with my daughter Florence Vohera.
53. I do not know about Conflict Free Diamond. I can
not tell that the certificate displayed in Invoice Exh.19 and 20 as
to Conflict Free Diamonds is printed without knowing about it.
Witness volunteers that I am studied upto 7 standard and do not
know meaning English words. It is true to say that the diamonds
mentioned in tax Invoice Exh.19 and 20 were not imported by
complainant company from foreign country. It is true to say that I
-- 5 of 7 --
29 C.C.No.1739/SS/2018
PW-01 Exh.5
can not tell from which company or person we had received the
diamonds mentioned in Exh.19 and 20 alleged to be sold to the
accused. It is not true to say that complainant company do not
possess any document to show that complainant company has
paid price of purchasing said diamonds mentioned in Exh.19 and
20. I had seen said document of making payment for purchase of
diamonds in the year 2018. Said document is not available now
with the complainant company. I do not remember the names of
persons from whom complainant purchased the raw goods and
made payment. I had stated names of those persons to my
Chartered Accountant for preparing Balance Sheet of year 2017-
2018. It is not true to say that I do not possess knowledge as to
whether the names of persons from whom the diamonds were
purchased are disclosed or not by Viral Shah in Balance Sheet. I
can not tell even approximately how many names I had narrated
to Viral Shah for disclosing the same in Balance Sheet.
On oral request of the advocate for the accused
cross examination is deferred till next date.
R.O.A.C.
(M. P. Saraf)
Date : 04.07.2024 Judicial Magistrate, First Class
58th Court, Bandra, Mumbai.
J.O.Code :MH01362
-- 6 of 7 --
30 C.C.No.1739/SS/2018
PW-01 Exh.5
CERTIFICATE
I affirm that the contents of this P.D.F. file evidence are same, word to word as
per the original evidence.
Name of Stenographer : Mrs. Aditi Ravikiran Dalvi
Court : Judicial Magistrate, First Class, 58th Court, Bandra,
Mumbai.
Dictated in open court on : 04.07.2024.
Transcribed and Typed on : 04.07.2024.
Order printed and Signed on : 04.07.2024.
Order Uploaded on : 04.07.2024.
-- 7 of 7 --

TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.