Interim Order 1

Order Details: Copy of Document.
Pdf Text: 7 C.C.No.736/SC/2022
CW-1 Exh.19
11. Whatever stated by me in my evidence affidavit is true
and correct and in token thereof I have signed the affidavit.
(M. P. Saraf)
Date : 23.07.2025 Judicial Magistrate(First Class),
58th Court, Bandra, Mumbai.
Cross examination of CW-01- Sangita Dhotre by advocate Mr.Shailesh
Pawar for the accused :
12. I am teacher in Excellant Classes. I get approximately
Rs.10,000/- per month from teaching in Excellant Classes. I am
knowing accused Sangita and her husband Raju since 15 years as both
are residing in same address near to me. During said 15 years there
was no talking instances in between us. It is true to say that there was
no friendship in between me and accused. My husband was knowing
them. Miresh Ranga Manjarekar is my younger brother. It is true to say
that he is also known by name Babu. I have produced details as to
making payment of Rs.8 lakhs to the accused. It is not true to say that I
have not produced any such records. I again say I have not produced
record as to giving money of Rs.8 lakhs to the accused. It is not true to
say that I have never given any amount to the accused and as such I
have not produced any record to that effect. I do not know that
husband of accused Mr. Raju has taken money on interest from my
brother Babu @ Miresh. I am not aware that Agreement is executed in
between my brother and husband of accused about said transaction. I
am not aware that subject cheque is given as a security by Mr. Raju to
my brother. Witness states that my brother Babu had told me about
giving such blank cheque by Raju with him. The cheque Exh.21 is given
-- 1 of 3 --
8 C.C.No.736/SC/2022
CW-1 Exh.19
by Raju Kunchikurve to me in the name of his wife. I do not remember
on what date or year the cheque was given to me. But two years have
lapsed. Raju Kunchikurve gave the cheque to me. It is true to say that I
had approached to Vakola Police Station for filing report againts Raju,
husband of the accused. It is true to say that first time Police refused to
accept my complaint but at second instance they accepted my
complaint. It is true to say that second time I approach to one Politician
who is himself advocate. It is true to say that I approached to a Minister
in Mantralaya. The Minister himself suggested me the name of local
politician. It is not true to say that I pressurize the police through
Minister to accept my complaint.
13. I had current account but now I closed it. The current
account was maintained with Bank of Baroda, Kalina branch in the
name of Gauri Tours and Travels.
On oral request of the advocate for the accused cross
examination is deferred till next date.
R.O.A.C.
(M. P. Saraf)
Date : 23.07.2025 Judicial Magistrate(First Class),
58th Court, Bandra, Mumbai.
J.O.Code :MH01362
-- 2 of 3 --
9 C.C.No.736/SC/2022
CW-1 Exh.19
CERTIFICATE
I affirm that the contents of this P.D.F. file evidence are same, word to word as per
the original evidence.
Name of Stenographer : Mrs. Aditi Ravikiran Dalvi
Court : Judicial Magistrate(First Class), 58th Court, Bandra,
Mumbai.
Dictated in open court on : 23.07.2025.
Transcribed and Typed on : 23.07.2025.
Order printed and Signed on : 23.07.2025.
Order Uploaded on : 23.07.2025.
-- 3 of 3 --