Skip to main content
Police Cases PS - Police Case PS

Santacruz Police StationVsVIKAS KRUPASHANKAR DUBEY

CNR MHMM18009946202171-
Additional Metropolitan Magistrate, Bandra, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--258 CrPC
Decision Date: 07th November 2022

TrustJury record updated 28 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
7104623/2021
Registration Date
18 Dec 2021

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    2

    Petitioner

    1. 1Santacruz Police Station

    Respondent

    1. 1VIKAS KRUPASHANKAR DUBEY

    Acts & Sections

    1
    MAHARASHTRA PROHIBITION ACT · Sec 85

    Police / FIR Details

    Police Station
    Santacruz P.Stn.
    FIR Number / Year
    03/2018

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 02-11-2022
Business: Ld. APP present.
accused and  adv. absent.
Next Purpose: Kept for Special Drive
Next Hearing Date: 07-11-2022

Date: 07-11-2022
Business: matter kept before special drive Accused absent Order passed below Exh-1 The proceeding is stopped vide sec 258 of CrPC Accused /is/are acquitted. Bail bond, if any stand cancelled.
Nature Of Disposal: 258 CrPC
Disposal Date: 07-11-2022

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 7010245/2021
Filing Date: 17-12-2021
First Hearing Date: 02nd November 2022
Decision Date: 07th November 2022
Court Number And Judge: 71-

    Orders

    1
    Final Order 1
    07 Nov 2022
    Order Details: Order Below EX 1
Pdf Text: IN THE COURT OF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE,
71st COURT, BANDRA, MUMBAI.
ORDER BELOW EXH.01 C.C.NO.4623/PS/2021
State (Santacruz P.S.) Vs. Vikas Krupashankar Dubey
Today the case is taken up for disposal in special drive as per
the directions of the Hon'ble High Court. Accused alleged to have
committed an offence P/U/Sec.85 (1) Bombay Prohibition Act. In
Mulchand Motilal Raka Vs. State of Maharashtra, 1996(1) Bom.
C.R.316, it was held that Section 258 of Cr. P.C., can be resorted to where
the special or unusual circumstances exists, such as nonappearance of the
witnesses/accused before the Court for considerable time. Record shows
that on several occasions the summons/warrant were issued against the
accused. However, prosecution failed to secure the presence of the
accused. This is a fit case wherein provisions of section 258 of Cr.P.C. can
be resorted to stop the proceeding. Hence, following order is passed.
O R D E R
1. Proceeding is stopped vide section 258 of Cr.P.C.
2. Accused is acquitted. His bail bonds, if any, stand canceled.
Sd/
Place : Mumbai. Metropolitan Magistrate,
Date : 07.11.2022 71st Court, Bandra, Mumbai.
aan/
-- 1 of 2 --
-- 2 of 2 --

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.