Skip to main content
Police Cases PS - Police Case PS

Santacruz Police StationVsVIKAS KRUPASHANKAR DUBE

CNR MHMM18009778202171-
Additional Metropolitan Magistrate, Bandra, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--258 CrPC
Decision Date: 10th August 2022

TrustJury record updated 28 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
7104473/2021
Registration Date
02 Dec 2021

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    2

    Petitioner

    1. 1Santacruz Police Station

    Respondent

    1. 1VIKAS KRUPASHANKAR DUBE

    Acts & Sections

    1
    MAHARASHTRA PROHIBITION ACT · Sec 85(1)

    Police / FIR Details

    Police Station
    Santacruz P.Stn.
    FIR Number / Year
    10/2018

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 10-08-2022
Business: matter kept before special drive
Accused absent
Order passed below Exh-1
The proceeding is stopped vide sec 258 of CrPC
Accused are acquitted. Bail bond, if any stand cancelled.
Nature Of Disposal: 258 CrPC
Disposal Date: 10-08-2022

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 7009858/2021
Filing Date: 02-12-2021
First Hearing Date: 10th August 2022
Decision Date: 10th August 2022
Court Number And Judge: 71-

    Orders

    1
    Final Order 1
    10 Aug 2022
    Order Details: Order Below EX 1
Pdf Text: IN THE COURT OF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE,
71st COURT, BANDRA, MUMBAI.
ORDER BELOW EXH.01 C.C.NO.4473/PS/2021
State (Santacruz P.S.) Vs. Vikas Krupashankar Dubey
Today the case is taken up for disposal in special drive as
per the directions of the Hon'ble High Court. Accused alleged to have
committed an offence P/U/Sec.85 (1) Bombay Prohibition Act. Case is
near about 01 year old. In Mulchand Motilal Raka Vs. State of
Maharashtra, 1996(1) Bom. C.R.316, it was held that Section 258 of
Cr. P.C., can be resorted to where the special or unusual circumstances
exists, such as nonappearance of the witnesses/accused before the
Court for considerable time. Record shows that on several occasions the
summons/warrant were issued against the accused. However,
prosecution failed to secure the presence of the accused. This is a fit case
wherein provisions of section 258 of Cr.P.C. can be resorted to stop the
proceeding. Hence, following order is passed.
O R D E R
1. Proceeding is stopped vide section 258 of Cr.P.C.
2. Accused is acquitted. His bail bonds, if any, stand canceled.
Sd/
Place : Mumbai. Metropolitan Magistrate,
Date : 10.08.2022 71st Court, Bandra, Mumbai.
ssm/
-- 1 of 2 --
-- 2 of 2 --

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.