Full Order Text
Final Order 1 · 17 Feb 2020 · CNR MHMM180093542019
Order Details: Order Below EX 1 Pdf Text: 1 IN THE COURT OF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE, 32ND COURT, BANDRA, MUMBAI. C.C. No. 921/N/2019 CNR No.MHMM180093542019 ORDER BELOW EXH1 1. This is an application under section 457 of Cr.P.C. seeking possession and keys of room No.10, Chawl No.1, CTS No.56, Chandrikabai Hublal Chawl, Saibaba Road, Jawahar Nagar, Khar (E), Mumbai. 2. The say of concern police/respondent has been called. It is informed that Lawrence Louis Vegas, age71 Yrs, was residing in said room No.10. He committed suicide. As there was no suspicion against anyone, inquiry was conducted regarding unnatural death. In inquiry, it reveals that the deceased was residing alone. Therefore, a lock was put on the said room. Till date, no legal heir of the deceased claimed right over the said room. Therefore, respondent/police replied to pass appropriate order. 3. Applicant claimed that he is son of original owner Chandrikabai Hublal Sharma and power of attorney of all the other legal heirs i.e. all the owners of the said chawl. The copy of power of attorney is filed alongwith the application ExhB. The Chandrikabai has been died. Her death certificate is at ExhA. As such, the applicant is the landlord. It is contended that the tenant Lawrence Lewis Vagas has committed suicide. His wife predeceased to him and he has no children or descendants or legal heirs. Since his death, and even after the inquiry the room premises has been lock down and despite request ExhC made -- 1 of 3 -- 2 to the concern police/respondent, they did not handover the keys. Therefore, being entitled for the possession of said room, the applicant sought possession and the keys. 4. As the room premises has been locked by the Nirmal Nagar police station/respondent, after the inquiry, same amounts to its seizure vide section 457 of Cr.P.C. Thus, this court has jurisdiction to decide the entitlement of possession irrespective of title. Same is also hold by the Hon'ble Bombay High Court in case of Anup R. Kantak Vs. State and Anr.; 2000 Cr.LJ 1078 (relied upon by the applicant). 5. As per the say of respondent, nobody claimed the possession of the room on behalf of the deceased tenant. The applicant being landlord, has right to possess the room premises on behalf of all the landlords. The applicant has been authorized to act on behalf of other landlors as per the power of attorney ExhB. Therefore, no other inquiry is required to see the entitlement of possession by the applicant. 6. Resultantly, the applicant being landlord entitled the possession of the said room. Therefore, application have to be allowed, as prayed for. The order does not confer any title, right or interest in the property. Hence, following order : ORDER i) Application allowed vide section 457 of Cr.P.C. ii) The concern police, Nirmal Nagar police station/respondent are directed to handover possession and keys to the applicant. -- 2 of 3 -- 3 iii) The applicant shall file undertaking to handover the vacant possession, if required and ordered by this court or by any other competent authority. Date: 17.02.2020 (Sudhir N. Shinde), Ssl. Metropolitan Magistrate, 32nd Court, Bandra, Mumbai. -- 3 of 3 --
