Skip to main content
Court Order

Interim Order 3

CNR MHMM18008757201919 Dec 2024
Back to Case

Full Order Text

Interim Order 3 · 19 Dec 2024 · CNR MHMM180087572019

Order Details: Order Below EX 1
Pdf Text: 12 C.C.No.1258/SS/2019
CW-1 Exh.13
28. Whatever stated by me in my evidence affidavit is true
and correct and in token thereof I have signed the affidavit.
(M. P. Saraf)
Date : 12.01.2024 Metropolitan Magistrate,
58th Court, Bandra, Mumbai.
Cross examination of CW-01- Gordon Gaspar D’souza by advocate Mr.
V. R. Pal for the accused :
29. I am retired person. I was doing businesses and working in
small firms. I am retired in the year 2000. We are only three persons in
my family. At present I am residing at Vile Parle. My wife is a retired
teacher. My son is also doing small business. Our monthly family
income is around Rs.60,000/-. My wife was assessed for paying Income
Tax. I am knowing accused No.2 Zakir Sayyad since year 2017. I came
in his contact seeing the advertisement published by him in News
papers for recruitment and jobs. It is true to say that the transaction
had taken place in between my son and ACE Media and Recruitment
Services Ltd. After reading advertisement given by the accused I
approached to their office at Bhandup in the year 2017.
30. I do not know whether my son had made signature or not
on the application. It is true to say that demand notice was not sent to
ACE Media and Recruitment Services Ltd. It is true to say that ACE
Media and Recruitment Services Ltd. is not made party to the
complaint. It is true to say that ACE Media and Recruitment Services
Ltd. has given confirmation letter to my son. It is not true to say that
demand notice is not served to accused No.3 Pratap More. Now I am
shown notice Exh.28. It is true to say that the name of accused No.3 is
absent in the notice Exh.28. It is not true to say that I have implicated
-- 1 of 2 --
13 C.C.No.1258/SS/2019
CW-1 Exh.13
accused No.3 deliberately to harass him. It is not true to say that
accused No.3 is not concerned with the case. It is true to say that it is
not mentioned in my complaint that the accused No.2 and 3 are
directors and responsible for day to day business of the company.
Cross examination is deferred till next date on oral request
of the advocate for the accused.
R.O.A.C.
(M. P. Saraf)
Date : 12.01.2024 Metropolitan Magistrate,
58th Court, Bandra, Mumbai.
J.O.Code :MH01362
Date : 19.12.2024
Resumed on S.A.
Further cross examination of CW-01- Gordon Gaspar D’souza by
advocate Mr. V. R. Pal for the accused :
31. Accused and their advocate absent. Hence, No Cross.
Cross examination is over.
No Re-examination.
R.O.A.C.
(M. P. Saraf)
Date : 19.12.2024 Judicial Magistrate(First Class),
58th Court, Bandra, Mumbai.
J.O.Code :MH01362
-- 2 of 2 --

TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.