Skip to main content
Misc Cases - Miscellaneous Cases

Nirmal Nagar Police StationVsPRASHANT LAHU JADHAV

CNR MHMM18008381201932-JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE (FIRST CLASS), 32ND COURT
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--Rejected
Decision Date: 17th February 2020

TrustJury record updated 27 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
3200647/2019
Registration Date
27 Nov 2019

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    2

    Acts & Sections

    1
    Indian Penal Code · Sec 279 · 338

    Police / FIR Details

    Police Station
    Nirmal Nagar P.Stn.
    FIR Number / Year
    76/2012

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 17-02-2020
    Business: Ld APP present
    Accused present with Advocate
    Heard Argument
    Order passed below Exh-1
    No justified explanation/ cause for delay found, no cognizance can be taken, as charge-sheet is time barred vide sec 468 of CrPC  Accordingly, charge sheet rejected and send back to the concern police station
    Nature Of Disposal: Rejected
    Disposal Date: 17-02-2020

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 708551/2019
    Filing Date: 27-11-2019
    First Hearing Date: 17th February 2020
    Decision Date: 17th February 2020
    Court Number And Judge: 32-JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE (FIRST CLASS), 32ND COURT

    Orders

    1
    Final Order 1Full order available
    17 Feb 2020

    Order Details: Order Below EX 1 Pdf Text: 1 IN THE COURT OF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE, 32ND COURT, BANDRA, MUMBAI. C.C. NO. 647/MISC/2019 CNR No.MHMM180083812019 ORDER BELOW EXH1 1. The chargesheet has been filed after delay of around more than four years. Thus, the investigating officer sought to condone delay and to accept the chargesheet on the ground that due to technical difficulties and transfer of investigating officer to other police station, the delay has been caused. 2. Perused the application…

    Read Full Order

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.