Skip to main content
Police Cases PS - Police Case PS

Santacruz Police StationVsLAXMANKUMAR RAJENDRA RAM

CNR MHMM18008243202271-
Additional Metropolitan Magistrate, Bandra, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--258 CrPC
Decision Date: 25th April 2023

TrustJury record updated 29 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
7105133/2022
Registration Date
26 Aug 2022

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    2

    Petitioner

    1. 1Santacruz Police Station

    Respondent

    1. 1LAXMANKUMAR RAJENDRA RAM

    Acts & Sections

    1
    Indian Penal Code · Sec 285

    Police / FIR Details

    Police Station
    Santacruz P.Stn.
    FIR Number / Year
    983/2022

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 31-03-2023
Business: Resume today.
Ld APP present.
Accused absent.
Matter is kept before Special Drive.
Next Purpose: Kept for Special Drive
Next Hearing Date: 25-04-2023

Date: 25-04-2023
Business: Resume today.
Order passed below Exh-1
The proceeding is stopped vide sec 258 of CrPC.
The accused are acquitted. His bail bonds, if any stands canceled.
Nature Of Disposal: 258 CrPC
Disposal Date: 25-04-2023

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 7008923/2022
Filing Date: 26-08-2022
First Hearing Date: 31st March 2023
Decision Date: 25th April 2023
Court Number And Judge: 71-

    Orders

    1
    Final Order 1
    25 Apr 2023
    Order Details: Order Below EX 1
Pdf Text: IN THE COURT OF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE,
71st COURT, BANDRA, MUMBAI.
ORDER BELOW EXH.01 C.C.NO.5133/PS/2022
State (Santacruz P.S.) Vs. Laxman Kumar Ram Rajendra Ram
Today the case is taken up for disposal in special drive as per
the directions of the Hon'ble High Court. Accused alleged to have
committed an offence P/U/Sec. 285 of IPC. Case is more than 8 months
old. In Mulchand Motilal Raka Vs. State of Maharashtra, 1996(1) Bom.
C.R.316, it was held that Section 258 of Cr. P. C., can be resorted to where
the special or unusual circumstances exists, such as nonappearance of the
witnesses/accused before the Court for considerable time. Record shows
that on several occasions the summons/warrant were issued against the
accused. However, prosecution failed to secure the presence of the
accused. This is a fit case wherein provisions of section 258 of Cr. P. C. can
be resorted to stop the proceeding. Hence, following order is passed.
O R D E R
1. Proceeding is stopped vide section 258 of Cr.P.C.
2. Accused is acquitted. His bail bonds, if any, stand canceled.
Sd/
Place : Mumbai. Metropolitan Magistrate,
Date : 25/04/2023. 71st Court, Bandra, Mumbai.
SRD
-- 1 of 1 --

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.