Full Order Text
Order 1 · 02 Jan 2025 · CNR MHMM180081812022
Order Details: Order Below EX 1 Pdf Text: CNR NO.MHMM18-008181-2022 C. C. No.360/MISC/2022 ORDER BELOW EXH.1 Read complaint. Perused documents placed on record. Heard Ld. Advocate Shri Dhanuka for the complainant. 2. According to complainant in the year 2010, accused entered into an agreement in respect of Survey No.10/A and 154/B of village Choyarsi, Dist. Gujrath and agreed to give 50% shares in their company and also agreed to give10,000 shares out of 20,000 shares of accused No.1 company. In pursuant to the said agreement the complainant in the year 2010 given I.Six crore to accused. In the year 2016-17 accused also gave another proposal and induced the complainant to deliver amount of I.13,30,00,000/-. However, as agreed the accused persons despite of request of several times filed to execute the agreement in respect of the transaction of the year 2016-17. it is further contended that, the accused instead of purchasing the agricultural land as agreed by the funds of complainant amount of I.9,00,00,000/- has been transferred in the name of Smt. Naya Gami. 2. It is further contended that, six mortgaged plots with complainant company have been transferred by the accused persons, without consent of the complainant by way of executing agreement to sale and received amount of I.6,25,00,000/- from the said transaction. Thus, according to complainant accused persons induced the complainant company to deliver the huge amount and misappropriated the said amount. Hence, this complaint. 3. Ld. Advocate Shri Dhanuka submits that, surprisingly in Anticipatory Bail Application Economic Offences Wing (EOW) supported to the version of complainant and latter on they closed the file by coming to the conclusion that, the dispute is of civil nature. Accused persons have cheated the complainant company. The detail investigation by police is -- 1 of 2 -- --2-- CNR NO.MHMM18-004645-2024 C. C. No.113/MISC./2024 necessary. Lastly, he prayed that, matter be sent for investigation to police as per provision of 156 (3) of Code of Criminal Procedure. 4. I would like to state here that, in the matter the EOW has conducted the inquiry and comes to the conclusion that, the dispute is of civil nature. I would like to state here that, the entire complaint and allegations made in are based on the documents which are in possession of the complainant. Therefore, the complainant can make out the case by leading his evidence. further, the compliance of 154 (3) of Cr. P. C. i.e. the copy of complaint has not been given to R.P.A.D. to The Commissioner of Police or to The Superintendent of Police. Already the preliminary inquiry has been carried out by EOW, in such circumstances I am of opinion that, no case made out for sending the same for investigation under section 156(3) of Cr. P. C. Therefore, the prayer to that effect is hereby rejected. The complainant shall lead his evidence under section 200 of Code of Criminal Procedure. Place : Mumbai. Date: 02/01/2025. SRD. Sd/- (A. B. Jadhav) Judicial Magistrate, (First Class), 71st Court, Bandra, Mumbai Dictated on :- 02/01/2025. Transcribed on :- 02/01/2025. Checked on :- 02/01/2025. Signed on :- 02/01/2025. SRD -- 2 of 2 --
