Full Order Text
Order 1 · 04 Jul 2023 · CNR MHMM180080372019
Order Details: Copy of Document. Pdf Text: Exh.11 C.C.No.1111/SS/2019 Whatever stated by me in my evidence affidavit is true and correct and in token thereof I have signed the affidavit. (M. P. Saraf) Date : 04.07.2023 Metropolitan Magistrate, 58th Court, Bandra, Mumbai. Cross examination of PW01 by advocate Vikram Singh for the accused : 10. I am doing three business. I am running a ration shop. I am also doing business of giving the cars on rent. I am also doing business of Real Estate. The business of Real Estate started in the year 2017. the business of renting car started in the year 2005. The ration shop is since year 2000 and I am looking after it from year 2002. I am taxpayer. I am submitting Income Tax Returns for the business run by me. I am submitting my individual Income Tax Returns in respect of my business Vinita Travels. The ration shop licence is in the name of my mother. I am showing my income accrued from Real Estate business in my personal return. I am submitting Income Tax Returns from year 2004. I have submitted Income Tax Returns for the year 2017, 2018 and 2019. I can produce said returns. 11. I am possessing and maintaining four to five accounts in different banks. As on date three saving bank accounts are in operation and rest of bank accounts are closed. I am ready to produce the bank statements of all bank accounts for the period 01.04.2018 to 31.03.2020. 12. I am knowing accused and her husband also. Both are staying near to my house. I have no monetary transaction at any point of time with the husband of the accused. I do not know exactly work the accused is doing but she might be serving as a housemaid. It is true to say that it is my contention that accused was intending to start business and therefore, I helped her by giving Rs.4,00,000/. It is not true to say that I have never helped her for running or starting any business by giving Rs.4,00,000/. It is not true to say that I am -- 1 of 2 -- Exh.11 C.C.No.1111/SS/2019 doing money lending business. It is not true to say that the document placed at Exh.13 is a incomplete document. It is not true to say that I have not produced all pages of said document. It is true to say that I have given cheque bearing No.043778 drawn on Canara Bank, Bandra (E) branch dated 30.08.2018 for Rs.4,00,000/ to the accused vide said document at Exh.13. It is true to say that the true copy of said cheque is not made a part of the document Exh.13. It is true to say that the cheque Exh.15 now shown to me is the same cheque given by the accused to me. It is not true to say that there was no legal liability towards the accused to pay me any amount on the date of execution of document Exh.13. It is not true to say that I used to collect interest at the rate of 8% to 10 % per annum from the accused in each month. It is not true to say that in the month of July 2019 the husband of the accused transferred Rs.4,000/ to my account towards payment of interest. 13. It is not true to say that I am running a money lending business and I had paid money to the accused on interest. It is not true to say that the disputed cheque was obtained by me from the accused as a security of transaction. It is not true to say that I have given amount on interest to so many persons in my vicinity. It is not true to say that the accused is not liable to any amount to me. It is not true to say that I have misused the disputed cheque Exh.15 for recovering money given as money lending business. Cross examination is over. No reexamination. R.O.A.C. (M. P. Saraf) Date : 04.07.2023 Metropolitan Magistrate, 58th Court, Bandra, Mumbai. J.O.Code :MH01362 -- 2 of 2 --
