Skip to main content
Police Cases PS - Police Case PS

B.K.C. Police StationVsDevilal Kacharu Patidar

CNR MHMM18008012202171-
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--258 CrPC
Decision Date: 08th August 2022

TrustJury record updated 28 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
7101740/2021
Registration Date
20 Jul 2021

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    2

    Acts & Sections

    1
    Indian Penal Code · Sec 285

    Police / FIR Details

    FIR Number / Year
    87/2020

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 09-02-2022
    Business: Ld APP present.
    Accused are absent. Adjournment for plea/charge. S.O.P. is in force.
    Next Purpose: NOT HEARD CASES
    Next Hearing Date: 08-08-2022
    
    Date: 08-08-2022
    Business: matter kept before special drive
    Accused absent
    Order passed below Exh-1
    The proceeding is stopped vide sec 258 of CrPC
    Accused are acquitted. Bail bond, if any stand cancelled.
    Nature Of Disposal: 258 CrPC
    Disposal Date: 08-08-2022

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 7004987/2021
    Filing Date: 19-07-2021
    First Hearing Date: 09th February 2022
    Decision Date: 08th August 2022
    Court Number And Judge: 71-

    Orders

    1
    Final Order 1
    08 Aug 2022
    Order Details: Order Below EX 1
    Pdf Text: IN THE COURT OF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE,
    71st COURT, BANDRA, MUMBAI.
    ORDER BELOW EXH.01 C.C.NO.1740/PS/2021
    State (BKC P.S.) Vs. Devilal Kachru Patidar
    Today the case is taken up for disposal in special drive as
    per the directions of the Hon'ble High Court. Accused alleged to have
    committed an offence P/U/Sec. 285 of IPC. Case is more than 01 year
    old. In Mulchand Motilal Raka Vs. State of Maharashtra, 1996(1)
    Bom. C.R.316, it was held that Section 258 of Cr. P.C., can be resorted
    to where the special or unusual circumstances exists, such as non
    appearance of the witnesses/accused before the Court for considerable
    time. Record shows that on several occasions the summons/warrant
    were issued against the accused. However, prosecution failed to secure
    the presence of the accused. This is a fit case wherein provisions of
    section 258 of Cr.P.C. can be resorted to stop the proceeding. Hence,
    following order is passed.
    O R D E R
    1. Proceeding is stopped vide section 258 of Cr.P.C.
    2. Accused is acquitted. His bail bonds, if any, stand canceled.
    Sd/
    Place : Mumbai. Metropolitan Magistrate,
    Date : 08.08.2022 71st Court, Bandra, Mumbai.
    ssm/
    -- 1 of 2 --
    -- 2 of 2 --

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.