Full Order Text
Final Order 1 · 03 Jan 2023 · CNR MHMM180074912018
Order Details: Order Below EX 1 Pdf Text: C.C.NO. : 241/MISC/2018 M/s.Kesari MICE DIV. of M/s.Kesari Tours Private Limited Vs. Mr.Nitin Sadekar MHMM180074912018 ORDER BELOW EXH.01 IN C.C.NO.241/SS/2018 (Dated 03.01.2023) 1. This is an application to condon the delay to file the complaint u/s.138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The complainant issued demand notice on 25.04.2018, which is delivered to the accused on 28.04.2018. The accused ought to have refund cheque amount on or before 13.05.2018. Thus, the complainant has to file the complaint on or before 13.06.2018. But the present complaint filed on 04.07.2018. Accordingly, the complaint is filed after 21 days delay. 2. Ld. Advocate of the complainant submitted that the accused assured to the complainant that he will pay the amount therefore, the complainant has not filed complaint against the accused. Accordingly, such delay is caused. 3. The notice is duly served upon the accused but the accused not appeared to contest the application. 4. In view of section 142 of Negotiable Instrument Act, no court shall take cognizance of offence punishable u/sec.138 except upon a complaint in writing made by the payee or holder in due course of the cheque and such complaint is made within one month of the date on which the cause of action arise under clause (c) of proviso to section 138, provided that the cognizance may be taken after the prescribed period if the complainant satisfies the court that he had sufficient cause for not making the complaint within such period. -- 1 of 2 -- C.C.NO. : 241/MISC/2018 M/s.Kesari MICE DIV. of M/s.Kesari Tours Private Limited Vs. Mr.Nitin Sadekar 5. In the present case, cause of action was arose on 13.05.2018. The complainant never turned to the court for 21 days. The complainant submitted that he has not filed complaint because the accused assured him that he will pay the amount. The said reason is not genuine and sufficient to condoned the delay. The complainant has has not duly explained reason for delay. There is no inability of the complainant to file the case within stipulated period. The complainant caused delay without sufficient reason. In such circumstances, in my view, delay shall not be condoned. Hence, I proceed to pass following order : O R D E R The application of the complaint is rejected. ( M. Y. Wagh ) Metropolitan Magistrate, Date : 03.01.2023 58th Court, Bandra, Mumbai. -- 2 of 2 --
