Full Order Text
Order 1 · 20 Jun 2025 · CNR MHMM180072462021
Order Details: Copy of Document. Pdf Text: 6 C.C.No.716/SS/2021 CW-1 Exh.13 10. Whatever stated by me in my evidence affidavit is true and correct and in token thereof I have signed the affidavit. (M. P. Saraf) Date : 20.06.2025 Judicial Magistrate(First Class), 58th Court, Bandra, Mumbai. Cross examination of CW-01- Purvang V. Doshi by advocate Mr.S.R.Sharma for the accused : 11. I am serving in a Diamond manufacturing company since year 2008 in Naresh Exports. In the year 2020-2021 I was getting Rs.30,000/- per month salary. I am staying with my family at Bhayinder. It is not true to say that I have to spent entire monthly salary for meeting of family expenses. It is true to say that before year 2020 I was getting salary of Rs.15,000/- per month. During year 2020- 2021 my yearly saving was approximately Rs.1 lakh. I am not assessable to pay Income Tax and as such I am not filing Income Tax Returns. I can produce Bank Passbook to show my yearly income of Rs.1 lakh in the year 2020. It is not true to say that in the year 2020 I had no financial capacity to make investment of Rs.12,50,000/-. I have obtained money from my wife and brother. 12. I am knowing accused since year 2019. We are staying opposite to each other in same building. It is true to say that I have no personal knowledge in respect of NIIT TECH Company. It is true to say that I am not aware whether accused is serving in said company. It is true to say that I had not personally seen any advertise or otherwise the offer of company a buy back offer. It is true to say that I had not seen any document of offer of increase of particular percent in investment. It is true to say that there is no agreement directly in between me and -- 1 of 3 -- 7 C.C.No.716/SS/2021 CW-1 Exh.13 NIIT TECH Company regarding investment scheme. I had invested Rs.11,83,750/- in said buy back offer of the company. It is true to say that said amount is not given by me directly to the company from my account. I had given said amount to accused for the purpose of investment. It is true to say that entire amount is not deposited in the account of accused. The amount came to be deposited as per directions of accused. Some amount is deposited in the account of his mother. Except accused and his mother the amount is not deposited to any other third party’s account. It is true to say that right now I can not tell exactly how much amount was deposited in the account of accused or his mother. I can tell the exact figure by verifying my passbook and record on next date. It is true to say that I have stated an amount of investment of Rs.12,50,000/- in my complaint and affidavit. Said amount is after adding profit on the amount of investment. It is true to say that I have not stated in my notice, complaint, evidence affidavit that I invested Rs.11,83,750/-. I again say I have stated in my notice. On oral request of the advocate for the accused cross examination is deferred till next date. R.O.A.C. (M. P. Saraf) Date : 20.06.2025 Judicial Magistrate(First Class), 58th Court, Bandra, Mumbai. J.O.Code :MH01362 -- 2 of 3 -- 8 C.C.No.716/SS/2021 CW-1 Exh.13 CERTIFICATE I affirm that the contents of this P.D.F. file evidence are same, word to word as per the original evidence. Name of Stenographer : Mrs. Aditi Ravikiran Dalvi Court : Judicial Magistrate(First Class), 58th Court, Bandra, Mumbai. Dictated in open court on : 20.06.2025. Transcribed and Typed on : 20.06.2025. Order printed and Signed on : 20.06.2025. Order Uploaded on : 20.06.2025. -- 3 of 3 --
