Interim Order 1

Order Details: Copy of Document.
Pdf Text: 6 C.C.No.716/SS/2021
CW-1 Exh.13
10. Whatever stated by me in my evidence affidavit is true
and correct and in token thereof I have signed the affidavit.
(M. P. Saraf)
Date : 20.06.2025 Judicial Magistrate(First Class),
58th Court, Bandra, Mumbai.
Cross examination of CW-01- Purvang V. Doshi by advocate
Mr.S.R.Sharma for the accused :
11. I am serving in a Diamond manufacturing company since
year 2008 in Naresh Exports. In the year 2020-2021 I was getting
Rs.30,000/- per month salary. I am staying with my family at
Bhayinder. It is not true to say that I have to spent entire monthly
salary for meeting of family expenses. It is true to say that before year
2020 I was getting salary of Rs.15,000/- per month. During year 2020-
2021 my yearly saving was approximately Rs.1 lakh. I am not
assessable to pay Income Tax and as such I am not filing Income Tax
Returns. I can produce Bank Passbook to show my yearly income of
Rs.1 lakh in the year 2020. It is not true to say that in the year 2020 I
had no financial capacity to make investment of Rs.12,50,000/-. I have
obtained money from my wife and brother.
12. I am knowing accused since year 2019. We are staying
opposite to each other in same building. It is true to say that I have no
personal knowledge in respect of NIIT TECH Company. It is true to say
that I am not aware whether accused is serving in said company. It is
true to say that I had not personally seen any advertise or otherwise the
offer of company a buy back offer. It is true to say that I had not seen
any document of offer of increase of particular percent in investment. It
is true to say that there is no agreement directly in between me and
-- 1 of 3 --
7 C.C.No.716/SS/2021
CW-1 Exh.13
NIIT TECH Company regarding investment scheme. I had invested
Rs.11,83,750/- in said buy back offer of the company. It is true to say
that said amount is not given by me directly to the company from my
account. I had given said amount to accused for the purpose of
investment. It is true to say that entire amount is not deposited in the
account of accused. The amount came to be deposited as per directions
of accused. Some amount is deposited in the account of his mother.
Except accused and his mother the amount is not deposited to any
other third party’s account. It is true to say that right now I can not tell
exactly how much amount was deposited in the account of accused or
his mother. I can tell the exact figure by verifying my passbook and
record on next date. It is true to say that I have stated an amount of
investment of Rs.12,50,000/- in my complaint and affidavit. Said
amount is after adding profit on the amount of investment. It is true to
say that I have not stated in my notice, complaint, evidence affidavit
that I invested Rs.11,83,750/-. I again say I have stated in my notice.
On oral request of the advocate for the accused cross
examination is deferred till next date.
R.O.A.C.
(M. P. Saraf)
Date : 20.06.2025 Judicial Magistrate(First Class),
58th Court, Bandra, Mumbai.
J.O.Code :MH01362
-- 2 of 3 --
8 C.C.No.716/SS/2021
CW-1 Exh.13
CERTIFICATE
I affirm that the contents of this P.D.F. file evidence are same, word to word as per
the original evidence.
Name of Stenographer : Mrs. Aditi Ravikiran Dalvi
Court : Judicial Magistrate(First Class), 58th Court, Bandra,
Mumbai.
Dictated in open court on : 20.06.2025.
Transcribed and Typed on : 20.06.2025.
Order printed and Signed on : 20.06.2025.
Order Uploaded on : 20.06.2025.
-- 3 of 3 --