Interim Order 1

Order Details: Copy of Document.
Pdf Text: 12 C.C.No.1146/SS/2018
CW-1 Exh.06
13. Whatever stated by me in my evidence affidavit is true
and correct and in token thereof I have signed the affidavit.
(M. P. Saraf)
Date : 10.07.2025 Judicial Magistrate(First Class),
58th Court, Bandra, Mumbai.
Cross examination of CW-01- Mr. Arvindbhai Mangukiya by advocate
Mr. Sidharth Shankar Sharma for the accused:
14. Ridhi Diamonds came in existence in the year 1999-2000.
Since beginning Ridhi Diamonds is Partnership Firm. There are total
eight partners of M/s. Ridhi Diamonds. I can tell their names.
Bhimjibhai Poonabhai Mangukiya, Babubhai Poonabhai Mangukiya,
Rajubhai Devrajbhai Mangukiya, Ashokbhai Bhimjibhai Mangukiya,
Pareshbhai Babubhai Mangukiya, Mukeshbhai Devrajbhai Mangukiya,
Kanjibhai Gagajibhai Mangukiya, Arvindbhai Gagajibhai Mangukiya
are the partners of the M/s. Ridhi Diamonds. The Partnership Firm is
registered firm. It being our joint family partnership firm, no Resolution
is required. There is nobody by named Sohil Jain related to Partnership
Firm. I do not know who is Mr. Sohil Jain. Mr. Kirtikumar Shah, Mr.
Jignesh Shah, Mr. Sandip K. Shah are not the partners nor I am
knowing them. I have first time heard names of above persons. I have
Partnership Deed. I will produce it on next date. All the decisions are
taken by Partners jointly and orally. It is true to say that I have not
produced any authority letter to file complaint on behalf of other
partners of the firm. It is true to say that I have not filed any document
to show that I am empowered to file complaint and depose on behalf of
complainant. Witness states that I am not aware and my advocate has
not advised. If my advocate advises I will file it. Accused No.2, 3 and 4
-- 1 of 3 --
13 C.C.No.1146/SS/2018
CW-1 Exh.06
only approached to us. Rest of the accused were in the company. I have
not stated falsely in my complaint para No.2 that all 9 accused
approached to complainant. I had instructed my advocate to make such
averment. It is not true to say that I am deposing false that only four
accused approached. Witness states that I have filed case against Tara
Jwells Ltd. In connection to Tara Jwells I have stated the name of all
directors of accused No.1 company. It is true to say that I have
mentioned the names of all nine accused on the basis of record of ROC.
Cross examination is deferred till next date as Court Recess
time.
R.O.A.C.
(M. P. Saraf)
Date : 10.07.2025 Judicial Magistrate(First Class),
58th Court, Bandra, Mumbai.
J.O.Code :MH01362
-- 2 of 3 --
14 C.C.No.1146/SS/2018
CW-1 Exh.06
CERTIFICATE
I affirm that the contents of this P.D.F. file evidence are same, word to word as per
the original evidence.
Name of Stenographer : Mrs. Aditi Ravikiran Dalvi
Court : Judicial Magistrate(First Class), 58th Court, Bandra,
Mumbai.
Dictated in open court on : 10.07.2025.
Transcribed and Typed on : 10.07.2025.
Order printed and Signed on : 10.07.2025.
Order Uploaded on : 10.07.2025.
-- 3 of 3 --