Skip to main content
Misc Cases - Miscellaneous Cases

Nirmal Nagar Police StationVsAbdul Rahim Jafar Shaikh +4 more

CNR MHMM18006967202132-JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE (FIRST CLASS), 32ND COURT
Additional Metropolitan Magistrate, Bandra, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--Rejected
Decision Date: 05th July 2022

TrustJury record updated 28 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
3200096/2021
Registration Date
08 Apr 2021

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    6

    Petitioner

    1. 1Nirmal Nagar Police Station

    Respondent

    1. 1Abdul Rahim Jafar Shaikh
    2. 2Sohel Matlub Shaikh
    3. 3Hamaja Tayyeb Shaikh
    4. 4Ibrahim Amir Qureshi
    5. 5Samir Matlabu Shaikh

    Acts & Sections

    1
    Indian Penal Code · Sec 160

    Police / FIR Details

    Police Station
    Nirmal Nagar P.Stn.
    FIR Number / Year
    105/2019

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 13-12-2021
Business: APP present,
Accused absent,
for say of accused,
Next Purpose: NOT HEARD CASES
Next Hearing Date: 15-03-2022

Date: 15-03-2022
Business: Ld App present,
Accused are absent,
for say of accused.
Next Purpose: NOT HEARD CASES
Next Hearing Date: 05-07-2022

Date: 05-07-2022
Business: Ld. APP present,
Accused No 1 to 5 absent,
Order below Exh. 1
Charge sheet is time barred vide section 468 of Cr.P.C. Accordingly, charge sheet rejected and send back to the concern police station. Inform commissioner of police accordingly. J.C. to comply
Nature Of Disposal: Rejected
Disposal Date: 05-07-2022

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 7002792/2021
Filing Date: 07-04-2021
First Hearing Date: 13th December 2021
Decision Date: 05th July 2022
Court Number And Judge: 32-JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE (FIRST CLASS), 32ND COURT

    Orders

    1
    Final Order 1Full order available
    05 Jul 2022

    Order Details: Order Below EX 1 Pdf Text: IN THE COURT OF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE, 32ND COURT, BANDRA, MUMBAI. C.C. NO. 96/MISC/2021 CNR. No. MHMM180069672021 ORDER BELOW EXH1 1. The chargesheet has been filed after delay of around three years. Thus, the investigating officer sought to condone delay and to accept the chargesheet on the ground that due to work load and technical difficulties of investigating officer, the delay has been caused mistakenly. 2. Perused the application, affidavit. Accused failed to…

    Read Full Order

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.