Full Order Text
Order 1 · 06 Dec 2021 · CNR MHMM180068292021
Order Details: Bail Order Pdf Text: C. C. No. 2551 PW 2021 State Vs Badrujama & Ors. CNR No. MHMM18-006829-2021 ORDER BELOW BAIL APPLICATION NO.4371/2021 1. Perused record. Heard both the sides and victim/injured. 2. The present application is filed under Section 437 of Code of Criminal Procedure for bail by Accused No.1, Badrujama Nayarebabar Khan @ Gattu, Accused No.2, Abdul Rahim @ Ravikumar Wanvamalai Khan and Accused No.5, Azhar Abdulla Sahadulla Qureshi, mainly on the grounds that allegations are false. No offence punishable under Section 326 of Indian Penal Code made out. Investigation is over. Other accused persons are already released on bail, etc. Ld. A.P.P. objected to it mainly on the ground that offence is serious. There is ample evidence against applicants. Accused/applicants have criminal antecedents. There is possibility of evidence tampering. Therefore, application shall be rejected. The informant/victim also appeared with his advocate. He also filed written objections to the bail and contended that Accused Nos.1 and 2, have criminal antecedents. There is possibility of tampering. They may not turned up for trial. 3. Admittedly the offence is registered at belated stage. The whole record shows that accused persons particularly Accused No.1, have criminal antecedents and the explanation offered by Ld. A.P.P. needs some consideration to the effect that due to pressure the offence was lodged at belated stage. The whole record of investigation after filing of charge sheet shows that there is no material produced to show that any grievous hurt is caused. But remaining offences punishable under Section 387 of Indian Penal Code and provisions of Arms Act, are of non-bailable nature. 4. The reasons assigned if compared with these background aspects particularly pertaining to antecedents of Accused Nos.1 and 2, it can be said though investigation is over and some of the accused are released on bail, such a relief can not be granted to them. Ground of parity is also not -- 1 of 2 -- C. C. No. 2551 PW 2021 State Vs Badrujama & Ors. CNR No. MHMM18-006829-2021 applicable to them, as the nature of allegations particularly relating to extortion are different on material aspects. 5. So far as applicant/Accused No.5, is concerned, the allegations are not much serious. The observations made in previous bail order particularly relating to nature of offence punishable under Section 326 of Indian Penal Code, are applicable to him. Considering his period of detention, fact that investigation is over, reasons assigned in the bail application and these aspects of merit, he is entitled to parity. Accordingly, his prayer needs due consideration. 6. In view of above discussed facts and circumstances, following order : ORDER a. Application is partly allowed. b. Applicant/Accused No.5, Azhar Abdulla Sahadulla Qureshi, is released on bail, on his furnishing P.B. and S.B. of Rs.15,000/-. Permission granted to deposit cash security instead of furnishing surety bond. c. Accused shall attend police station Dharavi on every alternate day for next two months, at 11.00 a.m. d. Accused shall not tamper with prosecution witness in any sense. e. Application is rejected to the extend of Accused No.1, Badrujama Nayarebabar Khan @ Gattu and Accused No.2, Abdul Rahim @ Ravikumar Wanvamalai Khan. MUMBAI (KOMALSING RAJPUT) DATE – 06.12.2021 M.M., 12TH COURT, BANDRA, MUMBAI -- 2 of 2 --
