Skip to main content
Misc Cases - Miscellaneous Cases

DHONDIRAM MARUTI IMADEVsDYNANESHVAR GORAKH SHINDE

CNR MHMM18005992202558-JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE FIRST CLASS 58TH COURT
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--Allowed Otherwise
Decision Date: 03rd October 2025

TrustJury record updated 30 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
364/2025
Registration Date
16 May 2025

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    2

    Acts & Sections

    1
    NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT · Sec 138 · 142

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 09-07-2025
    Business: Called on today  compliant rpresent his advocate is present O/Below Exh -01 Issue notice to respondent. adj for Notice report.
    Next Purpose: Miscellaneous Cases in Afternoon Session
    Next Hearing Date: 19-09-2025
    
    Date: 19-09-2025
    Business: Ld. JMFC is on leave charge with Ld. JMFC 71st court. Hence board is discharge. adj for
    Next Purpose: Miscellaneous Cases in Afternoon Session
    Next Hearing Date: 03-10-2025
    
    Date: 03-10-2025
    Business: 1. The delay stands condoned subject to costs of Rs. 200/- to be paid to legal aid fund.
    2. costs are condition precedent for registration of the complaint.
    3. Order dictated and pronounced in open court.
    Nature Of Disposal: Allowed Otherwise
    Disposal Date: 03-10-2025

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 7004757/2025
    Filing Date: 09-05-2025
    eFiling Number: AMH20230011592C202500012
    eFiling Date: 09-05-2025
    First Hearing Date: 09th July 2025
    Decision Date: 03rd October 2025
    Court Number And Judge: 58-JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE FIRST CLASS 58TH COURT

    Orders

    1
    Final Order 1Full order available
    03 Oct 2025

    Order Details: Order Below EX 1 Pdf Text: MHMM180059922025 Misc Cases/364/2025 DHONDIRAM MARUTI IMADE Vs. DYNANESHVAR GORAKH SHINDE IN THE COURT OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE (FIRST CLASS), 58th COURT, BANDRA, MUMBAI ORDER BELOW EXH.01 This is an application filed by the applicant for condonation of delay of 129 days caused due to fault of earlier advocate who failed to file physical copy of the present complaint within statutory time limit. 2. The respondent duly served but failed to contest the application.…

    Read Full Order

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.