Skip to main content
Court Order

Final Order 1

CNR MHMM18005415202109 Mar 2022
Back to Case

Full Order Text

Final Order 1 · 09 Mar 2022 · CNR MHMM180054152021

Order Details: Copy of Judgment
Pdf Text: Judgment 1 C.C. No.2265/PW/2021
MHMM180054152021 Received on : 14/10/2021
Registered on : 14/10/2021
Decided on : 09/03/2022
Duration : 00 Y. 04 M. 05 D.
Exh.No.- 10
IN THE COURT OF ADDL. CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE,
09TH COURT, BANDRA, MUMBAI
(Presided over by K.H. Thombre)
JUDGMENT
(As per Section 355 of Code of Criminal Procedure)
a) The Serial number of the case : C.C. No.2265/PW/2021
b) The date of commission of
offence
: 13/08/2021
c) The name of the complainant if
any
: The State through Khar police
station. Spl.L.A.C.No.120/2021.
d) The name of the accused persons,
parentage and residence
: Kolanji Krishnavel Harijan,
Age – 26 years,
Occupation- Nil
R/o.Room No.52, Navli Chawl,
Road No.3, Behind Bus Depot,
Khar(W), Mumbai
e) The offence complained of or
proved
: Under section 4, 25 of Indian Arms
Act.
f) The plea of the accused and his
examination, if any
: Accused pleaded not guilty and
claimed to be tried.
g) The Final Order : The accused is acquitted .
h) The date of such order : 09/03/2022
..2/-
-- 1 of 5 --
Judgment 2 C.C. No.2265/PW/2021
=====================================================
Learned counsel for Prosecution: APP Smt.MF Pakajade for State
Ld. Counsel for Accused : Adv. Mr.P.P.Khot
=====================================================
JUDGMENT
(Delivered on 09/03/2022)
1) The above named accused is charge-sheeted for the offence
punishable under section 4, 25 of Indian Arms Act.
The case of prosecution in short is as under: -
2) Informant Vishal Maruti Jadhav is a Police Constable attached to
Police Station, Khar. On 13/10/2021 he was on duty at Police Station from 20.33
hrs. At that time informant alongwith PSI Kharade and other staff proceeded for
patrolling. At about 08.40 hrs. they reached at Murti Galli, 3rd Road near Khar
Railway Station, Khar(W) one person started running by seeing the patrolling
squad. They chased and caught hold that person. They got a doubt that person
has concealed something behind his back under shirt. Police Constable Jadhav
brought two panchas and Police Constable More brought articles for sealing and
labeling. Personal search of the accused was taken in presence of panchas by PSI
Kharade. During personal search accused disclosed his name as Kolanji
Krishanvel Harijan and found one 14 inches long knife with iron blade. Accused
possessed this weapon without any permission and in contravention of the order
of Commissioner of Police, Brihan Mumbai. Accused and the sealed articles
brought to he police Station. Informant lodged the FIR. Offence vide Crime
No.120/2021 was registered against the accused and after completion of
investigation the charge-sheet is filed against the accused.
3) Charge is framed against the accused at Exh.02 . The contents of
the charge were explained to the accused in vernacular on V.C. to which accused
pleaded not guilty and claimed to be tried. Plea of the accused was recorded at
Exh.03.
..3/-
-- 2 of 5 --
Judgment 3 C.C. No.2265/PW/2021
4) The prosecution has examined in all two witnesses i.e. P.W.No.1
Vishal Maruti Jadhav, informant at Exh.05 and P.W.No.2 Deepak Ramesh
Kharade, Investigation Officer at Exh.07.
5) The statement of accused under section 313(1)(b) of the Code of
Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short the code) is recorded vide Exh.09. Defence
of the accused is of total denial and false implication. Heard Ld. APP and Ld.
Advocate for the accused.
6) Considering the evidence and arguments of the parties, following
points arose for determination. Findings are recorded for reasons to follow.
Sr.No POINTS FINDINGS
1] Whether the prosecution proved that on
13/10/2021 at about 20.50 hrs. at Murti Galli,
3rd Road, near Khar Railway Station,
Khar(W), Mumbai accused found in
possession of one big knife 14 inches in
length in contravention of Section 4 of Indian
Arms Act thereby committed an offence
punishable under Section 25 of Indian Arms
Act?
No.
2] What order? Accused is acquitted.
R E A S O N S
AS TO POINT NOs. 1 AND 2: -
7) In order to prove the offence against the accused P.W.1 Vishal
Maruti Jadhav deposed that when he reached alongwith PSI Deepak Kharade and
other officers while patrolling at Murti Galli accused started running by seeing
them. During personal search one knife of 14 inches was found kept under the
shirt behind back of the accused. The said knife was seized in presence of
panchas. Then FIR was lodged against the accused at Exh.06. In support P.W.2
Deepak Kharade deposed that he seized 14 inches knife in presence of panchas
from the accused which was kept under a shirt behind back of accused.
..4/-
-- 3 of 5 --
Judgment 4 C.C. No.2265/PW/2021
8) The charge against the accused is under Section 4 punishable under
Section 25 of the Indian Arms Act. As per Section 4 of the Indian Arms Act a
notification is required to be issued describing prohibition on possession of
weapon without licence. It is also provided under section 4 of the Indian Arms
Act that the description of the weapon is to be mentioned on which prohibition is
imposed for its possession. The burden is on the prosecution to prove that the
place from where the alleged weapon is seized from the possession of the
accused was a prohibited area at the time of alleged seizure of knife. The burden
is also on the prosecution to prove that the alleged knife which is seized from the
possession of the accused is within the category of prohibited weapon described
under the notification issued under Section 4 of the Indian Arms Act. The
prosecution failed to file on record any notification prohibiting area as well as a
particular category of weapon prohibited by way of an notification issued under
Section 4 of the Indian Arms Act. In absence of the said notification no
conclusion can be drawn that accused was possessed alleged knife in
contravention of Section 4 of the Indian Arms Act. It is also not deposed by any
of the witness that for possession of the alleged knife a licence is required under
Section 4 of the Indian Arms Act.
9) As per evidence of P.W.1 Vishal Jadhav and P.W.2 Deepak Kharade
accused was caught hold as he was running, then one constable was sent to bring
panchas and one constable was sent to bring the articles of sealing. After panchas
and articles came at the place they took personal search of the accused and one
knife was found concealed under shirt behind back of the accused. The alleged
seized knife is not produced during the trial before the Court to establish that it
was seized, what was the length and breadth of knife. The pancha witnesses are
also not examined. In absence of clear and independent evidence no conclusion
can be drawn that possession of the knife has been proved beyond reasonable
doubt.
..5/-
-- 4 of 5 --
Judgment 5 C.C. No.2265/PW/2021
10) Prosecution failed to file on record notification under Section 4 of
the Indian Arms Act prohibiting possession of alleged seized knife. The
possession of the knife from the accused is also not proved. For these reasons
accused cannot be held guilty of the charge levelled against him . For these
reasons following order is passed.
O R D E R
1) The accused Kolanji Krishnavel Harijan is acquitted of the offence
punishable under Section 25 of Indian Arms Act vide Section 248(1) of the
Code of Criminal Procedure.
2) The accused is in jail. He be released forthwith if, not required in
any other offence. Inform the Jail Authority accordingly.
3) The accused to furnish bail bonds in compliance of Section 437(A)
of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Jail Authority is directed to release the
accused on executing P.R.Bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand only) and
to submit the report accordingly to this Court.
4) Seized knife be forwarded to the District Magistrate, Brihan
Mumbai for disposal according to law after appeal period.
5) The copy of the Judgment be forwarded to District Magistrate vide
Sec.365 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for further compliance.
6) Dictated and pronounced in the open court.
Date:09/03/2022. (K.H.Thombre)
Addl.Chief Metropolitan Magistrate,
09th Court, Bandra, Mumbai.
Delivered on: 09/03/2022
Dictated on : 09/03/2022
Typed on : 09/03/2022
Signed on : 09/03/2022
vnh
../-
-- 5 of 5 --

TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.