Skip to main content
Police Case PW

Shahu Nagar Police StationVsSAGAR RAMASWAMI IRPULLA +2 more

CNR MHMM18005139202212-JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE (FIRST CLASS), 12TH COURT
Additional Metropolitan Magistrate, Bandra, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Contested--Accused Acquitted
Decision Date: 21st June 2022

TrustJury record updated 29 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
1201075/2022
Registration Date
10 Jun 2022

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    4

    Petitioner

    1. 1Shahu Nagar Police Station

    Respondent

    1. 1SAGAR RAMASWAMI IRPULLA
    2. 2VIJAY MATHAYYA GOYAL
    3. 3ZINU @ SHRINIWAS HANUMANTA JOGU

    Acts & Sections

    1
    Indian Penal Code · Sec 323 · 324 · 34 · 504 · 509

    Police / FIR Details

    Police Station
    Shahu Nagar
    FIR Number / Year
    193/2021

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 21-06-2022
Business: Called. APP present.
Accused and Advocate present.
Informant present.
Exh-5 VP of accused-Seen.
Exh-6 Application for bail by accused-filed
Exh-7 VP of informant-Seen.
Exh-8 Application seeking permission compound offence- Rejected
Exh-9 to 12 I.D. proof of the both the parties.
Exh-13 Pursis to admit document-seen
Exh-14 Charge
Exh-15 Deposition
Exh-16 Spot panchanama
Exh-17 Injury certificate
Order passed below Exh-1 Prosecution evidence closed.
Statements u/s 313 of Cr.P.C. dispense with.
Argument heard.
Exh-18 Judgment pronounced.
Accused are acquitted.
Matter is disposed off.
Nature Of Disposal: Accused Acquitted
Disposal Date: 21-06-2022

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 7005253/2022
Filing Date: 08-06-2022
First Hearing Date: 21st June 2022
Decision Date: 21st June 2022
Court Number And Judge: 12-JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE (FIRST CLASS), 12TH COURT

    Orders

    2
    Final Order 2
    21 Jun 2022
    Order Details: Order Below EX 1
Pdf Text: C. C. No. 1075 PW 2022 State Vs Sagar and ors.
CNR No. MHMM18-005139-2022
ORDER BELOW EXH.1
1. Material witness i.e. injured not supported prosecution. Accused
admitted the injury certificate and spot panchnama. Considering the
nature of allegations there is no point in examining further witnesses.
Therefore, prosecution evidence is closed.
2. No incriminating circumstances found in the evidence of witnesses
examined by the prosecution. Therefore, statements of accused U/Sec.313
of Code of Criminal Procedure are dispensed with.
MUMBAI (KOMALSING RAJPUT)
DATE – 21.06.2022 M.M., 12TH COURT, BANDRA, MUMBAI
Page - 1/1
-- 1 of 1 --
    Final Order 1Full order available
    21 Jun 2022

    Order Details: Copy of Judgment Pdf Text: C. C. No. 1075 PW 2022 State Vs Sagar and ors. CNR No. MHMM18-005139-2022 Exh.18 nk[ky fnukad % 08@06@2022 uksan.kh fnukad % 08@06@2022 QSlyk fnukad % 21@06@2022 dkyko/kh% 00 o- 00 e- 13 fn- fu’kk.kh Ø-18 eqacbZ ;sFkhy egkuxj naMkf/kdkjh] 12os U;k;ky;] ckanzk] eqacbZ ;kaps U;k;ky;kr ¼ fiBkflu vf/kdkjh dkseyflax lh- jktiwr ½ QkStnkjh [kVyk Ø-1075@ih-MCY;q-@2022 egkjk"Vª 'kklu] }kjk iksyhl Bk.ks 'kkgquxj] eqacbZ ---fQ;kZnh fo#/n 1- lkxj jkekLokeh bjiqYyk] o; & 29 o”ksZ]…

    Read Full Order

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.