Police Cases PS - Police Case PS
Vakola Police StationVsDATTASINGH RAGHUVEERSINGH LAKHANPAL
CNR MHMM18004610202171-
Additional Metropolitan Magistrate, Bandra, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--Dismissed
Decision Date: 10th August 2022
TrustJury record updated 28 Sept 2026
Case Overview
- Registration Number
- 7102956/2021
- Registration Date
- 17 Sept 2021
Advocates
1For Petitioner
For Respondent
Not available
Parties
2Petitioner
Respondent
Acts & Sections
1Maharashtra Police Act · Sec 142
Police / FIR Details
- Police Station
- Vakola P.Stn
- FIR Number / Year
- 52/2021
Case History / Proceedings
Case History
Date: 30-10-2021 Business: LD. APP Present. Accused absent. Issue summons to accused. For Charge Next Purpose: NOT HEARD CASES Next Hearing Date: 16-02-2022 Date: 16-02-2022 Business: LD APP Present Accused absent for plea Next Purpose: Kept for Special Drive Next Hearing Date: 10-08-2022 Date: 10-08-2022 Business: matter kept before special drive Accused absent Order passed below Exh-1 The proceeding is stopped vide sec 258 of CrPC Accused are acquitted. Bail bond, if any stand cancelled. Nature Of Disposal: Dismissed Disposal Date: 10-08-2022
Additional Case Details
Additional Case Details
Filing Number: 7007193/2021 Filing Date: 16-09-2021 First Hearing Date: 30th October 2021 Decision Date: 10th August 2022 Court Number And Judge: 71-
Orders
1Final Order 110 Aug 2022
10 Aug 2022
Order Details: Order Below EX 1 Pdf Text: IN THE COURT OF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE, 71st COURT, BANDRA, MUMBAI. ORDER BELOW EXH.01 C.C.NO.2956/PS/2021 State (Vakola P.S.) Vs. Dattasingh Raghuvirsingh Lakhanpal Today the case is taken up for disposal in special drive as per the directions of the Hon'ble High Court. Accused alleged to have committed an offence P/U/Sec.142 of the Bombay Police Act. Case is near about 01 year old. In Mulchand Motilal Raka Vs. State of Maharashtra, 1996(1) Bom. C.R.316, it was held that Section 258 of Cr. P.C., can be resorted to where the special or unusual circumstances exists, such as nonappearance of the witnesses/accused before the Court for considerable time. Record shows that on several occasions the summons/warrant were issued against the accused. However, prosecution failed to secure the presence of the accused. This is a fit case wherein provisions of section 258 of Cr.P.C. can be resorted to stop the proceeding. Hence, following order is passed. O R D E R 1. Proceeding is stopped vide section 258 of Cr.P.C. 2. Accused is acquitted. His bail bonds, if any, stand canceled. Sd/ Place : Mumbai. Metropolitan Magistrate, Date : 10.08.2022 71st Court, Bandra, Mumbai. ssm/ -- 1 of 2 -- -- 2 of 2 --
TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.
