Interim Order 4

Order Details: Order Below EX 1
Pdf Text: MHMM180040442023 Summary Cases/5800365/2023
Eknath Waman Bansode Vs. Ramesh Sakharam
Yadav
IN THE COURT OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE(FIRST CLASS),
58TH COURT, BANDRA, MUMBAI
ORDER BELOW APPLICATION EXH.22
This is an application for recalling complainant on the ground
that some questions remained to be asked in cross examination.
2. Complainant objected the application vide detailed reply Exh.23.
3. Heard advocate Anil More for the accused and advocate Vikas
Kharat for the complainant.
4. Record shows that accused was given more than sufficient
opportunity to exercise right of cross examination. Accordingly,
advocate for the accused had conducted thorough cross examination of
complainant. Perusal of application shows vague reasons meeting out
necessity of recalling witness. Recalling of witness appears not
necessary for the just decision of the case which is statutory mandate
while exercising powers under section 311 of Code of Criminal
Procedure. It is not that accused was not given full opportunity. There
is no legal substance and merits in the application. Hence, I pass
following order.
ORDER
1. Application is rejected.
2. Order dictated and pronounced in open court.
3. Order be uploaded on Court Web Portal.
Mumbai, (M. P. Saraf)
Dated : 17.09.2025 Judicial Magistrate(First Class),
58th Court, Bandra, Mumbai.
J.O.Code – MH01362
-- 1 of 2 --
CERTIFICATE
I affirm that the contents of this P.D.F. file Order are same, word to word as per the
original Order.
Name of Stenographer : Mrs. Aditi Ravikiran Dalvi
Court : Judicial Magistrate(First Class), 58th Court, Bandra,
Mumbai.
Dictated in open court on : 17.09.2025.
Transcribed and Typed on : 17.09.2025.
Order printed and Signed on : 17.09.2025.
Order Uploaded on : 17.09.2025.
-- 2 of 2 --