Skip to main content
Police Cases PS - Police Case PS

B.K.C. Police StationVsMUKESH JAGA SAHANI

CNR MHMM18003491202371-
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--258 CrPC
Decision Date: 15th June 2024

TrustJury record updated 29 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
7102018/2023
Registration Date
19 May 2023

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    2

    Acts & Sections

    1
    MOTOR VEHICLES ACT · Sec 185

    Police / FIR Details

    FIR Number / Year
    623/2023

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 05-10-2023
    Business: Resume today.
    Ld APP present.
    Accused absent. Adjournment for plea/charge.
    Next Purpose: NOT HEARD CASES
    Next Hearing Date: 15-06-2024
    
    Date: 15-06-2024
    Business: Resume today.
    matter kept before special drive.
    Order passed below Exh-1
    The proceeding is stopped vide sec 258 of CrPC
    The accused stands discharged. His bail bond if any stand cancelled.
    Custody of muddemal if any be destroyed after appeal period.
    Nature Of Disposal: 258 CrPC
    Disposal Date: 15-06-2024

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 7003291/2023
    Filing Date: 19-05-2023
    First Hearing Date: 05th October 2023
    Decision Date: 15th June 2024
    Court Number And Judge: 71-

    Orders

    1
    Final Order 1
    15 Jun 2024
    Order Details: Order Below EX 1
    Pdf Text: IN THE COURT OF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE,
    71st COURT, BANDRA, MUMBAI.
    ORDER BELOW EXH.01 IN C. C. NO. 2018/PS/2023
    State (B.K.C. P.S.)
    V/s.
    Mukesh Jaga Sahani
    Today is Special Drive for disposal of unattended, petty, steal
    and ineffective cases be taken up. Accused alleged to have committed an
    offence punishable under section 185 of M. V. Act. Case is more than 01
    year old. In
    Mulchand Motilal Raka Vs. State of Maharashtra, 1996(1)
    Bom. C.R.316, it was held that Section 258 of Cr. P.C., can be resorted to
    where the special or unusual circumstances exists, such as non-appearance
    of the witnesses/accused before the Court for considerable time.
    Prosecution failed to secure the presence of the accused. This is a fit case
    wherein provisions of section 258 of Cr.P.C. can be resorted to stop the
    proceeding. No purpose would serve by continuing the matter. Hence,
    following order is passed.
    O R D E R
    1. Proceeding is stopped vide section 258 of Cr.P.C.
    2. Accused is discharged. His bail bonds, if any, stand canceled.
    Place : Mumbai.
    Date : 15/06/2024.
    SRD.
    Sd/-
    Metropolitan Magistrate
    71st Court, Bandra, Mumbai.
    -- 1 of 1 --

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.