Skip to main content
DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CASES

BALAVINDER HARBANS SINGHVsSUKHVINDER HARBANS SINGH +2 more

CNR MHMM18003367201832-JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE (FIRST CLASS), 32ND COURT
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--Dismissed
Decision Date: 04th January 2019

TrustJury record updated 24 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
47/2018
Registration Date
15 Mar 2018

Advocates

0

No advocate information is available in this record.

Parties

4

Acts & Sections

1
Maharashtra Land Revenue Code · Sec 12 · 18 · 19 · 20 · 22

Case History / Proceedings

Case History
Date: 06-04-2018
Reason For Adjournment: Court Vacant
Next Purpose: DV Cases
Next Hearing Date: 27-04-2018

Date: 27-04-2018
Reason For Adjournment: Court Vacant
Next Purpose: DV Cases
Next Hearing Date: 19-05-2018

Date: 19-05-2018
Reason For Adjournment: Presiding Officer not available
Next Purpose: DV Cases
Next Hearing Date: 30-06-2018

Date: 30-06-2018
Business: Applicant absent
Respondent absent
Notice report awaited
Adj for report
Next Purpose: DV Cases
Next Hearing Date: 03-09-2018

Date: 03-09-2018
Business: Ld MM Is on leave
Board discharged
Next Purpose: DV Cases
Next Hearing Date: 29-10-2018

Date: 29-10-2018
Business: Applicant and Advocate absent
Notice report awaited
Adj for dismissal
Next Purpose: DV Cases
Next Hearing Date: 04-01-2019

Date: 04-01-2019
Business: Applicant absent
Order passed below Exh-1
Case is dismissed for want of prosecution on the part of applicant
Nature Of Disposal: Dismissed
Disposal Date: 04-01-2019

Additional Case Details

Additional Case Details
Filing Number: 2823/2018
Filing Date: 15-03-2018
First Hearing Date: 06th April 2018
Decision Date: 04th January 2019
Court Number And Judge: 32-JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE (FIRST CLASS), 32ND COURT

Orders

1
Final Order 1
04 Jan 2019
Order Details: Copy of Interim Maintenance Order
Pdf Text: IN THE COURT OF ADDL. CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE,
32ND COURT, BANDRA, MUMBAI.
C. C. No. 47/DV/2018
CNR No. MHMM180033672018
ORDER BELOW EXH.1
Perusal of record would indicate that, the complainant
remaining absent since from filing of complaint. Moreover, no effective
steps has been taken on behalf of complainant for recording verification
on record. Therefore, no purpose would be served by keeping the case
open when the complainant have failed to prosecute the same in proper
perspective. Hence, I find that, this case can be disposed of. Hence, case
is dismissed, for want of prosecution on the part of complainant.
Sd/
Date : 03.01.2019
ssl.
(Sudhir N. Shinde)
Metropolitan Magistrate, 32nd Court,
Bandra, Mumbai.
-- 1 of 1 --

TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.