DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CASES
BALAVINDER HARBANS SINGHVsSUKHVINDER HARBANS SINGH +2 more
CNR MHMM18003367201832-JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE (FIRST CLASS), 32ND COURT
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--Dismissed
Decision Date: 04th January 2019
TrustJury record updated 24 Sept 2026
Case Overview
- Registration Number
- 47/2018
- Registration Date
- 15 Mar 2018
Advocates
0No advocate information is available in this record.
Parties
4Acts & Sections
1Maharashtra Land Revenue Code · Sec 12 · 18 · 19 · 20 · 22
Case History / Proceedings
Case History
Date: 06-04-2018 Reason For Adjournment: Court Vacant Next Purpose: DV Cases Next Hearing Date: 27-04-2018 Date: 27-04-2018 Reason For Adjournment: Court Vacant Next Purpose: DV Cases Next Hearing Date: 19-05-2018 Date: 19-05-2018 Reason For Adjournment: Presiding Officer not available Next Purpose: DV Cases Next Hearing Date: 30-06-2018 Date: 30-06-2018 Business: Applicant absent Respondent absent Notice report awaited Adj for report Next Purpose: DV Cases Next Hearing Date: 03-09-2018 Date: 03-09-2018 Business: Ld MM Is on leave Board discharged Next Purpose: DV Cases Next Hearing Date: 29-10-2018 Date: 29-10-2018 Business: Applicant and Advocate absent Notice report awaited Adj for dismissal Next Purpose: DV Cases Next Hearing Date: 04-01-2019 Date: 04-01-2019 Business: Applicant absent Order passed below Exh-1 Case is dismissed for want of prosecution on the part of applicant Nature Of Disposal: Dismissed Disposal Date: 04-01-2019
Additional Case Details
Additional Case Details
Filing Number: 2823/2018 Filing Date: 15-03-2018 First Hearing Date: 06th April 2018 Decision Date: 04th January 2019 Court Number And Judge: 32-JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE (FIRST CLASS), 32ND COURT
Orders
1Final Order 104 Jan 2019
04 Jan 2019
Order Details: Copy of Interim Maintenance Order Pdf Text: IN THE COURT OF ADDL. CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE, 32ND COURT, BANDRA, MUMBAI. C. C. No. 47/DV/2018 CNR No. MHMM180033672018 ORDER BELOW EXH.1 Perusal of record would indicate that, the complainant remaining absent since from filing of complaint. Moreover, no effective steps has been taken on behalf of complainant for recording verification on record. Therefore, no purpose would be served by keeping the case open when the complainant have failed to prosecute the same in proper perspective. Hence, I find that, this case can be disposed of. Hence, case is dismissed, for want of prosecution on the part of complainant. Sd/ Date : 03.01.2019 ssl. (Sudhir N. Shinde) Metropolitan Magistrate, 32nd Court, Bandra, Mumbai. -- 1 of 1 --
TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.
