Full Order Text
Order 1 · 14 Sept 2023 · CNR MHMM180028352022
Order Details: Copy of Interim Maintenance Order Pdf Text: C. C. No. 58 DV 2022 Reshma Vs Praveen and ors. CNR-MHMM18-002835-2022 ORDER BELOW EXH.7 1. Perused record. Heard both sides. The applicant approached this court under Section 12 of Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, hereinafter referred as D.V. Act, through protection officer. In the said application she claimed various reliefs and by way of this application also sought interim relief of maintenance and residence. 2. As per applicant, her marriage with respondent Mr. Praveen Babu Kunchikurve, hereinafter referred as main respondent, took place on 06.12.2015. Out of said marriage two children, daughter Diya and son Tanish, born. Main respondent caused various acts of domestic violence as narrated in the main application. Therefore, she filed main application and present application for interim reliefs in it. 3. Respondent in his reply denied all the adverse allegations. He contended that he has taken care of all the requirements of applicant and children. Applicant herself is adamant and not taking care of respondent. His mother is ill and dependent on him. He is ready to further married life with applicant. He has no sufficient means of income. He has not caused any domestic violence. Therefore, application shall be rejected. 4. Considering adverse pleadings of both the parties, their submissions and other facts and circumstances I framed following points for my determination and recorded my findings on each of them as follows for the reasons discussed below- POINTS FINDINGS 1. Does from the material on record applicant succeeded in making out prima facie case of commission of domestic violence against her by the respondent ? ..In the affirmative. 2. Whether applicant is entitled for the relief of interim maintenance as prayed for ? ...In the affirmative. Page - 1/3 -- 1 of 3 -- C. C. No. 58 DV 2022 Reshma Vs Praveen and ors. CNR-MHMM18-002835-2022 3. What order ? ..Appln. is partly allowed R E A S O N S 5. As stated above, both the parties filed their respective pleadings which are supported by affidavits. The applicant in addition to it filed on record certain documents and it is also admitted that applicant is not residing with the respondent and he has not made any arrangement for her survival as well as survival of the children residing with her. Against it, respondents except bare denials by way of their say and affidavit raised no concrete defence. The contents of the affidavit the copies of other documents and the fact that no arrangement made clearly leads to prima facie inference that there caused domestic violence by the respondent. The conduct of the respondent from whole record also reflects the fact that respondents taking no care of the day to day requirements of the applicants. It is submitted that he has no means of income and he loss the job, is not defence at all. He is bound to maintain the applicants. In such a situation it is clear that the respondents committed various acts of domestic violence against the applicants. Therefore, I recorded my findings on Point Nos. 1 and 2, in the affirmative. Considering the facts pleaded pertaining to income of main respondent and material on record in support of it I am of the opinion that following order will serve the cause of justice, - ORDER a. The application is partly allowed. b. The respondent Mr. Praveen Babu Kunchikurve, is herewith directed to pay the interim maintenance of Rs.4,000/-(Rs. Four Thousand) per month to the applicant and Rs.2,000/- (Rupees Two Thousand) per month to each of the child, daughter Diya and son Tanish, from the date of application, till the decision of the main application towards Page - 2/3 -- 2 of 3 -- C. C. No. 58 DV 2022 Reshma Vs Praveen and ors. CNR-MHMM18-002835-2022 maintenance and education expenses of the child. It means main respondent shall pay total amount of Rs.8,000/- (Rs. Eight Thousand) per month to the applicant and her children, from the date of application till its disposal. c. The respondent, Mr. Praveen Babu Kunchikurve, is also directed to pay Rs.2,000/- (Rupees Two Thousand only) towards house rent. d. The prayer for other interim reliefs is rejected. e. The copy of this order shall be given free of costs to both the parties and if Respondent failed to comply the order the applicant is directed to file separate application bearing separate number for recovery of arrears. MUMBAI (KOMALSING RAJPUT) DATE – 14.09.2023 M.M., 12TH COURT, BANDRA, MUMBAI Page - 3/3 -- 3 of 3 --
