Skip to main content
Court Order

Final Order 2

CNR MHMM18002476201812 Dec 2025
Back to Case

Full Order Text

Final Order 2 · 12 Dec 2025 · CNR MHMM180024762018

Order Details: Order Below EX 1
Pdf Text: MHMM180024762018 Summons Cases SS/95/2018
MOHASIN RAHIM MARADIA Vs. RUSTAM
SHAIKH
IN THE COURT OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE(FIRST CLASS),
58TH COURT, BANDRA, MUMBAI
ORDER BELOW EXH.01
The complainant and advocate absent. The case is pending
since year 2018. Plea of accused was recorded on 16.05.2025. Matter is
pending for cross examination of the accused by the complainant. No
further steps taken by the Complainant despite of passing specific order
dated 08.12.2025. It seems that complainant has lost interest in
proceeding with the matter and as such complainant not taking steps
nor remaining present till date. Keeping the file pending years together
without proceeding further taking appropriate steps by the complainant
is unjustified.
2. Considering the year of the case there is reason to believe
that complainant might have lost interest in proceeding with the case.
Hence, I pass following order.
ORDER
1. Complaint is dismissed in default of the complainant vide
section 256 of Code of Criminal Procedure and section 279 of
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
2. Accused is acquitted of the offence punishable under section
138 of Negotiable Instrument Act.
3. Order dictated and pronounced in open court.
Mumbai, (M. P. Saraf)
Dated : 12.12.2025. Judicial Magistrate(First Class),
58th Court, Bandra, Mumbai.
J.O.Code-MH01362
-- 1 of 2 --
CERTIFICATE
I affirm that the contents of this P.D.F. file Order are same, word to word as per the
original Order.
Name of Stenographer : Mrs. Aditi Ravikiran Dalvi
Court : Judicial Magistrate(First Class), 58th Court, Bandra,
Mumbai.
Dictated in open court on : 12.12.2025.
Transcribed and Typed on : 12.12.2025.
Order printed and Signed on : 12.12.2025.
Order Uploaded on : 12.12.2025.
-- 2 of 2 --

TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.