Skip to main content
Bail Application

Shahu Nagar Police StationVsVivek Santosh Bhalerao

CNR MHMM18001835202512-JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE (FIRST CLASS), 12TH COURT
Additional Metropolitan Magistrate, Bandra, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--Bail Refused
Decision Date: 13th February 2025

TrustJury record updated 30 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
445/2025
Registration Date
11 Feb 2025

Advocates

0

No advocate information is available in this record.

Parties

2

Petitioner

  1. 1Shahu Nagar Police Station

Respondent

  1. 1Vivek Santosh Bhalerao

Acts & Sections

1
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita · Sec 326(G)

Police / FIR Details

Police Station
Shahu Nagar
FIR Number / Year
42/2025

Case History / Proceedings

Case History
Date: 11-02-2025
Business: Matter called out before in-charge Court.        Application is registered. Say of I.O and APP called. Adj for say, argument and order on main application.
Next Purpose: CUSTODY CASES
Next Hearing Date: 13-02-2025

Date: 13-02-2025

Additional Case Details

Additional Case Details
Filing Number: 445/2025
Filing Date: 11-02-2025
First Hearing Date: 11th February 2025
Decision Date: 13th February 2025
Court Number And Judge: 12-JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE (FIRST CLASS), 12TH COURT

Orders

1
Final Order 1
13 Feb 2025
Order Details: Bail Order
Pdf Text: mm
OURTOFLD JME.CS 12 TH COU	IN THE OURT AT BANDRA
MUMBAI
C.RNO: 42 OF2025
U's- 326 (G) B.N.S
ShahunagarPolice Station
Versus
Mr. VivekSantosh Bhalerao
Subject : Application for Bail /Cash Bai
Gall	sanyoo
MAY IT PLEASE YOUR WORSHIP :
That accused is a law abiding and peace loving citizen of India and is
a 	permanent resident 	of 	Mumbai 	and is residing 	alongwith his
family.
2. That the accused was arrested by the Shahunagar Police Station, on
8/2/2025, 	vide 	C. R. 	No. 	42/2025, 	u/s- 	326(G) 	BNS and he was
produced before the Ld JMFC'S holiday court at Bandra, Mumbai and
subsequently he was remanded to jail custody on 10/2/2025.
3. That it is 	alleged against the Accused 	that he is 	involved 	in the
offence of causing mischie 	Dy fire or explosive substance with intent
to destroy the shop.
4. The Accused furtherstates hat, he is i
implicated in this case andhasnothi
ne is 	innocent 	and has been falsely
Mothingto do with theallegedoffence
Created with Scanner Pro
-- 1 of 1 --

TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.