Skip to main content
Summary Cases

SARIN TECHNOLOGIES INDIA PRIVATE LIMITEDVsYAXAY BHARATKUMAR GAJJAR

CNR MHMM18000858202258-JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE FIRST CLASS 58TH COURT
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--Case Withdrawn Accused Acquitted
Decision Date: 02nd May 2024

TrustJury record updated 28 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
5800115/2022
Registration Date
11 Feb 2022

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    2

    Acts & Sections

    1
    NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT · Sec 138R/W141

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 22-04-2022
    Business: case is not traceable.
    Next Purpose: FOR VERIFICATION
    Next Hearing Date: 12-09-2022
    
    Date: 12-09-2022
    Business: When called out. complainant absent his advocate present.
    Adj for summons report.
    Next Purpose: Awaiting services of notice / summons
    Next Hearing Date: 05-11-2022
    
    Date: 05-11-2022
    Business: When called out. complainant absent and his advocate present. Exh. 7- application for issuance of B/W.
    O/- Issue B/W  of Rs 15000/-.
    Adj for warrant report.
    Next Purpose: Awaiting execution of Service Summons/BW
    Next Hearing Date: 30-03-2023
    
    Date: 30-03-2023
    Business: When called out. complainant absent his advocate present.
    Adj for warrant report.
    Next Purpose: Awaiting execution of Service Summons/BW
    Next Hearing Date: 11-07-2023
    
    Date: 11-07-2023
    Business: When called out. complainant absent his advocate present. Adj for warrant report.
    Next Purpose: Awaiting execution of Service Summons/BW
    Next Hearing Date: 24-11-2023
    
    Date: 24-11-2023
    Business: Ld. M.M. is on leave.
    Hence board is discharged.
    Adj to
    Next Purpose: Awaiting execution of Service Summons/BW
    Next Hearing Date: 16-02-2024
    
    Date: 16-02-2024
    Business: When matter is called out complainant is present his advocate are present.
    Accused and his advocate are absent.
    Application for Bailable Warrant as prayed.
    O/Exh - 08 Issue B/w of Rs.  5000 against accused.
    Adj for warrant report.
    Next Purpose: Awaiting execution of Service Summons/BW
    Next Hearing Date: 02-05-2024
    
    Date: 02-05-2024
    Business: Order below Exh. 01-
        1. The complaint stands dismissed as withdrawn.
        2. The accused is acquitted of the offense punishable u/s. 138 of the NI act.
        3. Order dictated and pronounced in open court.
    Nature Of Disposal: Case Withdrawn Accused Acquitted
    Disposal Date: 02-05-2024

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 7001112/2022
    Filing Date: 09-02-2022
    First Hearing Date: 22nd April 2022
    Decision Date: 02nd May 2024
    Court Number And Judge: 58-JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE FIRST CLASS 58TH COURT

    Orders

    4
    Final Order 4
    02 May 2024
    Order Details: Order Below EX 1
    Pdf Text: MHMM180008582022
    Summary Cases/5800115/2022
    SARIN TECHNOLOGIES INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED
    Vs. YAXAY BHARATKUMAR GAJJAR
    IN THE COURT OF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE, 58TH COURT,
    BANDRA, MUMBAI
    ORDER BELOW EXH.01
    Authorised representative of the Complainant present.
    Advocate for the complainant present. Complainant and accused
    have settled the dispute amicably out of the court. Complainant is
    not ready and willing to proceed with the case. Accordingly, he
    had filed application at Exh.9 voluntarily for withdrawal of the
    complaint. Hence, I pass following order.
    ORDER
    1. Complaint stands dismissed as withdrawn.
    2. The accused is acquitted of the offence punishable
    u/sec.138 of The Negotiable Instrument Act.
    3. Order dictated and pronounced in open court.
    ( M. P. Saraf )
    Metropolitan Magistrate,
    Date : 02.05.2024 58th Court, Bandra, Mumbai.
    J.O.Code: MH01362
    -- 1 of 2 --
    2
    CERTIFICATE
    I affirm that the contents of this P.D.F. file Order are same, word to word as per the
    original Order.
    Name of Stenographer : Mrs. Aditi Ravikiran Dalvi
    Court : Metropolitan Magistrate, 58th Court, Bandra,
    Mumbai.
    Dictated in open court on : 02.05.2024.
    Transcribed and Typed on : 02.05.2024.
    Order printed and Signed on : 02.05.2024.
    Order Uploaded on : 02.05.2024.
    -- 2 of 2 --
    Final Order 3
    02 May 2024
    Order Details: Order Below EX 1
    Pdf Text: -- 1 of 2 --
    -- 2 of 2 --
    Final Order 2
    02 May 2024
    Order Details: Order Below EX 1
    Pdf Text: MHMM180008582022
    Summary Cases/5800115/2022
    SARIN TECHNOLOGIES INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED
    Vs. YAXAY BHARATKUMAR GAJJAR
    IN THE COURT OF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE, 58TH COURT,
    BANDRA, MUMBAI
    ORDER BELOW EXH.01
    Authorised representative of the Complainant present.
    Advocate for the complainant present. Complainant and accused
    have settled the dispute amicably out of the court. Complainant is
    not ready and willing to proceed with the case. Accordingly, he
    had filed application at Exh.9 voluntarily for withdrawal of the
    complaint. Hence, I pass following order.
    ORDER
    1. Complaint stands dismissed as withdrawn.
    2. The accused is acquitted of the offence punishable
    u/sec.138 of The Negotiable Instrument Act.
    3. Order dictated and pronounced in open court.
    ( M. P. Saraf )
    Metropolitan Magistrate,
    Date : 02.05.2024 58th Court, Bandra, Mumbai.
    J.O.Code: MH01362
    -- 1 of 2 --
    2
    CERTIFICATE
    I affirm that the contents of this P.D.F. file Order are same, word to word as per the
    original Order.
    Name of Stenographer : Mrs. Aditi Ravikiran Dalvi
    Court : Metropolitan Magistrate, 58th Court, Bandra,
    Mumbai.
    Dictated in open court on : 02.05.2024.
    Transcribed and Typed on : 02.05.2024.
    Order printed and Signed on : 02.05.2024.
    Order Uploaded on : 02.05.2024.
    -- 2 of 2 --
    Final Order 1
    02 May 2024
    Order Details: Order Below EX 1
    Pdf Text: -- 1 of 2 --
    -- 2 of 2 --

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.