Skip to main content
Court Order

Interim Order 1

CNR MHMM18000790202429 Jan 2024
Back to Case

Full Order Text

Interim Order 1 · 29 Jan 2024 · CNR MHMM180007902024

Order Details: Order Below EX 1
Pdf Text: Notice Case No. 15 N 2024 Ruchita Vs State and ors.
CNR No. MHMM18-000790-2024
ORDER BELOW EXH.1
1. The application bearing Notice Case No.192 N 2023, is already
allowed and following bank officers are already directed by this court to
transfer the amounts lying in the accounts respectively maintained by them.
2. Despite that disobeying those directions for no reason those bank
officers refusing the applicant to transfer the amount assigning untenable
reasons. Therefore, the present application is filed to issue contempt
proceedings against those bank officers.
3. The relief sought is having serious consequences. The record
clearly reflects that the bank officers disobeyed the directions. However,
before proceeding further one chance needs to be granted to them. Therefore,
with a rider following order -
ORDER
a. The concerned Nodal Officers of following banks/branches are
directed to transfer the amounts lying in the accounts in their respective
banks/branches, described in following table, in an account of applicant Miss
Ruchita Raju Redkar, bearing Account No.319702010754365, maintained
with Union Bank of India, Branch Vile Parle East, Mumbai having its IFSC
Code UBIN0531979, immediately.
Particulars of the banks and amounts, etc.
Bank Account Number IFSC No. Branch Amount
ICICI Bank 653305056573 ICIC0006533 SANGLI Rs.1,00,000/-
ICICI Bank 002705502200 ICIC0000027 NASHIK-
SHARANPUR
ROAD
Rs.1,89,400/-
ICICI Bank 215205004997 ICIC0002152 BHOSARI Rs.1,72,934/-
YES Bank 016563700002370 YESB0000165 JANAKPURI,
NEW DELHI
Rs.3,00,000/-
YES BANK 003363400000940 YESB000033 BHILWARA,
RAJASTHAN
Rs.50,000/-
Total Rs.8,12,334/-
-- 1 of 2 --
Notice Case No. 15 N 2024 Ruchita Vs State and ors.
CNR No. MHMM18-000790-2024
b. The copy of this order shall be immediately sent to them and if they
failed to obey the above direction, they shall explain as to why contempt
proceedings shall not be initiated against them and other proceeding,
including prosecution, shall not be initiated against them.
c. Hamdast allowed.
Sd/-
MUMBAI (KOMALSING RAJPUT)
DATE – 29.01.2024 M.M., 12TH COURT, BANDRA, MUMBAI
-- 2 of 2 --

TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.